On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 6:29 AM, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > An upstream has named their GPL software almost identically to a > proprietary piece of software.
I think it would be best to pro-actively rename the software now rather than wait until renaming the software would be more painful. Even if the proprietary software developer gives their permission, they could always sell the software to someone else, who might not be as forgiving of the naming similarity. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
