Re: apr_reslist semantics

[William A. Rowe, Jr.]

Nick Kew wrote:

On Mon, 12 May 2008 16:10:14 -0500
"William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

So if we take a few more days to smooth out the rough edges of 1.3.0
I think it's a huge win to get these things right, reslist included.

+1 to taking time for this.  But at the moment we're in danger of
doing a rushed/botched job on a get-it-out-for-httpd-2.2.9 agenda.
That's basically because noone has been thinking of 1.3 as a
release candidate until the last couple of weeks, so we haven't
given sufficient thought to loose ends.

A definite +1 for dynamically linking apr-util modules by default.
For DBD and LDAP that's a no-brainer with the big dependencies,
but it could apply more widely.

Agreed, I'm thinking dbm specifically, and xlate and xml less urgently.

Bill