William A. Rowe, Jr.
Fri, 16 May 2008 07:44:28 -0700
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I am assuming that this is NOT with the latest apr-1.3 HEAD code. Can you confirm that with the latest, all is well?
Right - these issues were pre-patch. Once you applied r656722, all is well now. Based on Roy's legitimately rabid reaction to the cruft that blows into his simple application linkage, I believe we should solve the ldap issue before rolling 1.3.0 since there is a semantic build syntax change even though it remains binary compatible. I'd hate to suggest that patch during a subversion bump. Bill