Bojan Smojver
Mon, 19 May 2008 14:28:21 -0700
On Mon, 2008-05-19 at 15:56 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Then if we consider this non-portable, the prepared statement cache > certainly should not be a static, but scoped per apr_dbd_t? > > I would prefer we /not/ offer dbd specific features, as the hacks around > the initial row offset illustrate we contribute to per-platform hackery > instead of resolving it for the user. I'm not sure what you mean here... -- Bojan