Re: Backport policy, WAS: Re: svn commit: r678140 - /apr/apr/branches/1.3.x/memory/unix/apr_pools.c

[Mladen Turk]

Sander Striker wrote:

Modified:
   apr/apr/branches/1.3.x/memory/unix/apr_pools.c

This is just an example, I'm seeing a change land on trunk and a
minute later on 1.3.x.  What's our backport policy?  Do we just commit
to trunk and 1.3.x, or are we going to go a route where we get review
prior to backporting?  Think httpd STATUS...

I usually wait for a day or two before committing to 1.3.x or 1.2.x
from trunk. This particular one is copy/paste typo and was not observed
until Bojan and myself did some actual hard core testing.

Think the backporting policy is "act responsible" right now,
or am I wrong here?

Regards
--
^(TM)