Sander Striker
Sat, 19 Jul 2008 15:00:50 -0700
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 9:59 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mladen Turk wrote: [...] >> Think the backporting policy is "act responsible" right now, >> or am I wrong here? > > APR entirely operates under CtR. > > Fortunately, the pace of development has ensured that these can be reviewed, Can be, but not ensured that that they have been. > and our versioning policy avoids debates as in httpd about what "features" > can be backported. Since all new features are to trunk only, it's a fairly > clean policy. Agreed, sort of. > I don't see any reason to move to RtC, but discussion is always welcome. I'm not going to advocate moving to RtC for stable branches, even though I'm a strong proponent of it, for the simple fact that I am not dedicating enough time to APR these days. My comments mainly stem from my own lack of spending time on reviewing 1.3 in the last 6 months, and getting surprises now. Cheers, Sander