Bojan Smojver
Sat, 19 Jul 2008 15:49:07 -0700
On Sat, 2008-07-19 at 14:46 +0100, Nick Kew wrote: > Which begs the question, how did the typo get in to 1.3? I think it probably has to do with the fact that, as introduced, the code worked (by accident) in many cases. Without doing the tests of the last few days, it would have been really hard to spot. -- Bojan