Bojan Smojver
Mon, 21 Jul 2008 02:44:52 -0700
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 09:24 +0200, Mladen Turk wrote: > Since we use pools, this can be achieved only by creating a separate > pool for each accepted socked that will be destroyed once the > socket is not needed any more. Somewhat related... I kind of remember a discussion about every new pool allocating 8k of memory. Do we have a way to control this? -- Bojan