Re: Changing the order of cleanup for some core objects

[Mladen Turk]

Bojan Smojver wrote:

PPS. The implementation of Joe's proposal can be put into something we
may call respool (as opposed to reslist), so that people can choose that
if they so wish.

With Joe's proposal the additional pool for reslist and the
single cleanup registered there is actually the pre_cleanup,
so why not using that? We'll preserve 8K of memory to the user
simply by using that.

Also seems that during discussion a simple fact that even with
pre_cleanup the standard pool cleanup will happen anyway is
not taken into account. If you don't destroy them in destructor
they'll be destroyed by the standard pool cleanup, so I don't
understand why is that such a big deal. All that will happen
is that destructor will be called before pools gets destroyed,
and Joe was doing that with bunch of additional pools.


Regards
--
^(TM)