Bojan Smojver
Thu, 07 Aug 2008 16:46:39 -0700
On Fri, 2008-08-08 at 01:18 +0200, Peter Poeml wrote: > Anyway, there must be something that I overlook, or there may be other > circumstances that influence the behaviour (1.2/1.3 difference in pool > handling??). The patch from trunk fixes the issue for me although I > can't say why. I can only say for sure that I have a large memleak with > the current 1.3.x code. The patch from trunk may work by accident, depending on how apr_reslist_create() was called and the order of pool destruction. However, it may create double free situation in some circumstances (this is what big discussion about pre_cleanups was all about), so it is not safe. -- Bojan