jean-frederic clere
Thu, 17 Apr 2008 02:02:59 -0700
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Apr 14, 2008, at 10:15 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:On Apr 14, 2008, at 10:00 AM, Jess Holle wrote:Jim Jagielski wrote:Sorry to butt in, but is there any hope of getting issue #44803 addressed in that timeframe?Plus, every 3 months would coincide with the report-to-board cycle, making it easier for everyone to follow :) Next is due in May, so if we release this month, then we can follow a "Release before the board report" or else "Release at board report" cycle (with the caveat I noted before ;) ) As noted (and as I pinged a few people about in Amsterdam), I'm looking to push for a 2.2.9 soon. We have enough for sure warrant it... There is the "ship 1.3.0 with 2.2.9" thread going on, but I do not want 2.2.9 to hold off too long for that... So I'd like to propose 2.2.9 for the end of this month.Possibly, yes.Quick look: We need to re-adjust this post fixups, since this should be a setting ala flushpackets, etc...
I have looked to #44803 in fact we need something like JkOptions +ForwardURIEscaped which means something that requires changes in both mod_rewrite and mod_proxy.
I will propose a patch soon. Cheers Jean-Frederic