Ruediger Pluem
Mon, 12 May 2008 13:33:45 -0700
On 05/12/2008 08:39 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jim Date: Mon May 12 11:39:34 2008 New Revision: 655594 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=655594&view=rev Log: backport proposal: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=645813 Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS?rev=655594&r1=655593&r2=655594&view=diff ============================================================================== --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS (original) +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS Mon May 12 11:39:34 2008 @@ -187,6 +187,16 @@ bump. Not sure what style and typo changes are required. jim: Latest rev of patch should address stated concerns :)+ * mod_proxy: In the case that we fail to read the response line+ from the backend and if we are a reverse proxy request, shutdown + the connection WITHOUT ANY response to trigger a retry by the client + if allowed (as for idempotent requests). + Trunk version of patch: + http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=645813 + Backport version for 2.2.x of patch: + Trunk version works+ +1:
I assume you are +1 as well :-)? Regards Rüdiger