Re: Consider breaking out ldap library dependencies?

[Jim Jagielski]

On Jun 5, 2008, at 12:18 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:

On 06/05/2008 06:00 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:

apr-util-1.3 lets us link httpd (and support/) in such a way as to avoid

all ldap entanglements.
Any thoughts on adopting
http://people.apache.org/~wrowe/ldap/httpd-2.2-ldap.patch

for the coming release? If built static, do we already merge up all those LDADD flags, or is there some magic we need to add to accomplish that?

As I would not like to see 2.2.9 already *dependent* on apr / apr- util 1.3.x (only shipped with apr / apr-util 1.3.x) I propose to do this only on trunk and postpone backporting to the point of time where we make 2.2.x dependent on 1.3.x which IMHO depends on the real live quality of 1.3.x. So if it is

good, it may be 2.2.10 which becomes dependent on 1.3.x.

Hmmm... I don't see the patch as requiring 1.3.x...

What am I missing?