Jim Jagielski
Mon, 04 Aug 2008 07:24:03 -0700
On Aug 4, 2008, at 9:54 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 08/04/2008 03:50 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:--- httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/proxy_util.c (original)+++ httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/proxy_util.c Mon Aug 4 05:53:50 2008@@ -1380,7 +1380,6 @@ proxy_worker *worker = (proxy_worker *)theworker; if (worker->cp->res) { worker->cp->pool = NULL; - apr_reslist_destroy(worker->cp->res); } return APR_SUCCESS; }Well, you've beat me :) The complete conn_pool_cleanup function can be omitted, and there is no need for checking if (conn->worker->cp->pool) in the connection_destructor.Might be. At the current state it makes it possible to keep trunk and 2.2.x very similar until all in apr land is sorted out. We can cleanup the remaining parts then.
+1. Let's wait until APR gets sorted out before we start mucking around with "fixing" 2.2 and trunk to handle an in-flux APR