Re: SNI in 2.2.x (Re: Time for 2.2.10?)

[Sander Temme]

On Aug 20, 2008, at 7:10 AM, Nick Kew wrote:

It might be worth a --with-SNI configuration option, which
would label it as an experimental feature.

+1, given that it'd be off by default.  Anyone care to craft some  
autofoo?

S.

--
Sander Temme
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4  B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF





smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature