/me confused. Why the -1 again? Are you having problems
building brotli? Or is it that you don't like how
brotli is being built? Or what?

> On Apr 11, 2017, at 1:08 AM, William A Rowe Jr <wr...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 11:25 PM,  <wr...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Author: wrowe
>> Date: Tue Apr 11 04:25:34 2017
>> New Revision: 1790917
>> 
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1790917&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Veto veto of veto
>> 
>> Modified:
>>    httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
>> 
>> Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
>> URL: 
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS?rev=1790917&r1=1790916&r2=1790917&view=diff
>> ==============================================================================
>> --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS (original)
>> +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS Tue Apr 11 04:25:34 2017
>> @@ -190,6 +190,8 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
>>                   http://svn.apache.org/r1790853
>>                   http://svn.apache.org/r1790860
>>      +1: jim, jorton,
>> +     -1: wrowe (build schema of 0.6.0 is as worthless as 0.5.2, git master
>> +                is still entirely functional, apparently waiting for 1.0.0)
> 
> 
> I suggest we just give up for this cycle. Quoting README.md from 0.6.0...
> 
> To build and run tests, simply do:
> 
>    $ ./configure && make
> 
> If you want to install brotli, use one of the more advanced build systems 
> below.
> 
> #### Bazel
> 
> See [Bazel](http://www.bazel.build/)
> 
> #### CMake
> 
> The basic commands to build, test and install brotli are:
> 
>    $ mkdir out && cd out && ../configure-cmake && make
>    $ make test
>    $ make install
> 
> You can use other [CMake](https://cmake.org/) configuration. For example, to
> build static libraries and use a custom installation directory:
> 
> [...]
> 
> 
> [wrowe@hub Brotli-0.6.0]$ ls
> common           dec  include  MANIFEST.in  python     setup.cfg  tools
> CONTRIBUTING.md  enc  LICENSE  PKG-INFO     README.md  setup.py
> 
> 
> That's adorkable :)  And also an unusable package. I was trying to
> review to simply determine if the command-line utility ('/usr/bin/bro',
> which conflicts with Ubuntu and RedHat packages) had actually
> been adjusted to a unique name, but no... no such luck.

Reply via email to