I do not understand why we are discussing brotli build issues here. We do not 
plan to ship it, only to link against their now supposedly stable API if we 
find it. If Linux distros are willing to build and package it and solve any 
conflicts they might have in naming bins, I am totally fine with that.

mod_brotli, I just built and tested in my environment. It works nicely, people 
want it, I voted for it.

-Stefan

> Am 11.04.2017 um 13:32 schrieb Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com>:
> 
> /me confused. Why the -1 again? Are you having problems
> building brotli? Or is it that you don't like how
> brotli is being built? Or what?
> 
>> On Apr 11, 2017, at 1:08 AM, William A Rowe Jr <wr...@apache.org> wrote:
>> 
>> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 11:25 PM,  <wr...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> Author: wrowe
>>> Date: Tue Apr 11 04:25:34 2017
>>> New Revision: 1790917
>>> 
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1790917&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> Veto veto of veto
>>> 
>>> Modified:
>>>   httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
>>> 
>>> Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
>>> URL: 
>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS?rev=1790917&r1=1790916&r2=1790917&view=diff
>>> ==============================================================================
>>> --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS (original)
>>> +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS Tue Apr 11 04:25:34 2017
>>> @@ -190,6 +190,8 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
>>>                  http://svn.apache.org/r1790853
>>>                  http://svn.apache.org/r1790860
>>>     +1: jim, jorton,
>>> +     -1: wrowe (build schema of 0.6.0 is as worthless as 0.5.2, git master
>>> +                is still entirely functional, apparently waiting for 1.0.0)
>> 
>> 
>> I suggest we just give up for this cycle. Quoting README.md from 0.6.0...
>> 
>> To build and run tests, simply do:
>> 
>>   $ ./configure && make
>> 
>> If you want to install brotli, use one of the more advanced build systems 
>> below.
>> 
>> #### Bazel
>> 
>> See [Bazel](http://www.bazel.build/)
>> 
>> #### CMake
>> 
>> The basic commands to build, test and install brotli are:
>> 
>>   $ mkdir out && cd out && ../configure-cmake && make
>>   $ make test
>>   $ make install
>> 
>> You can use other [CMake](https://cmake.org/) configuration. For example, to
>> build static libraries and use a custom installation directory:
>> 
>> [...]
>> 
>> 
>> [wrowe@hub Brotli-0.6.0]$ ls
>> common           dec  include  MANIFEST.in  python     setup.cfg  tools
>> CONTRIBUTING.md  enc  LICENSE  PKG-INFO     README.md  setup.py
>> 
>> 
>> That's adorkable :)  And also an unusable package. I was trying to
>> review to simply determine if the command-line utility ('/usr/bin/bro',
>> which conflicts with Ubuntu and RedHat packages) had actually
>> been adjusted to a unique name, but no... no such luck.
> 

Reply via email to