I retract my +1 and think instead we should open a vote on Blake's idea. On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 5:20 PM, Brandon Williams <dri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think this is a better solution. > > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 5:03 PM, Blake Eggleston <beggles...@apple.com> > wrote: > >> Maybe we should add p...@cassandra.apache.org or something and send them >> there? I don't subscribe to commits@ because it's too much email, I >> would be interested in being notified when a PR is opened though. >> >> On March 20, 2017 at 3:00:47 PM, Jeff Jirsa (jji...@gmail.com) wrote: >> >> There's no reason for the dev list to get spammed everytime there's a >> github PR. We know most of the time we prefer JIRAs for real code PRs, but >> with docs being in tree and low barrier to entry, we may want to accept >> docs through PRs ( see https://issues.apache.org/jira >> /browse/CASSANDRA-13256 >> , and comment on it if you disagree). >> >> To make that viable, we should make it not spam dev@ with every comment. >> Therefore I propose we move github PR comments/actions to commits@ so as >> not to clutter the dev@ list. >> >> Voting to remain open for 72 hours. >> >> - Jeff >> > >
