On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 6:50 PM, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think I see where this is coming from, but rather see it perceived that > bugfix updates to a stable branch should happen in a timely manner. We can't > hold back releases forever and we should demonstrate that we can release > 0.10.1 quickly, if needed. >
I didn't say apache process is bad anyway. I agree with you on this point. And I'm perfectly ok with agile development as you know that ;) But in any case, I find it isn't normal to have spurious logs in production that may have others side effects. This is difficult to have such logs when you have a product online or in tests and I wouldn't use a service that accept such logs without knowing if it has side effects or not (and then logs should be more quiet anyway to allow read of others). I just opened the bug because I was testing that when noah called for the release, but of course it could have been detected before and maybe that's the point. In my opinion, something could be done to test most of expected scenarios before release. It won't be perfect but in this case, it would have help I guess. > I hope this addresses your concern. > Sure, sorry for my french. I didn't want to be rude. I was just worried that for once time couchdb could become unstable. - benoît
