Re: OpenSSL 1.0.0

[Jim Jagielski]

On Jul 27, 2009, at 7:33 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:

Guenter Knauf wrote:

Guenter Knauf schrieb:

Hi,
Sander Temme schrieb:

On Jul 21, 2009, at 11:59 AM, Peter Sylvester wrote:

Are there any plans to make mod_ssl compilable against
openssl-1.0.0betaX,

as far as I see, just some STACK things and casts need to be cleaned.

Trunk became aware of OpenSSL trunk a while ago... but I don't recall

putting that up for backport.  I'll do so when I have come cycles.

I've yesterday compiled both HEAD and 2.2.x branch with OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta 3, and that went fine - although I have a very picky compiler for

NetWare which normally breaks for every type mismatch ...

whoops - I mixed up the include paths; Peter is right - seems that we

need to backport these:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=748396
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=749466

based on the above HEAD patches here's a 2.2.x branch patch:
http://people.apache.org/~fuankg/diffs/openssl-1.x-2.2.x.diff
please check and test if I catched all - I've tested on NetWare with
OpenSSL 0.9.7m, 0.9.8k and 1.0.0 beta3, and that went fine.
If nobody objects I'll propose this for backport.

Since 2.2.12 just shipped, I'd say apply it.  It will be easier for
everyone to validate from svn, no?

So +1 for committing and I'll commit to helping review-after-commit.

Huh? For 2.2??