[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-4129?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16103813#comment-16103813
]
Eduardo Breijo edited comment on MYFACES-4129 at 7/27/17 8:03 PM:
------------------------------------------------------------------
I have provided a patch. You will notice that I added few more missing EL
implicit objects. Any feedback will be appreciated.
was (Author: eduardobreijo):
I have provided a patch. You will noticed that I added few more missing EL
implicit objects. Any feedback will be appreciated.
> When @FacesConfig annotation is used in a CDI bean, implicit EL objects don't
> work
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MYFACES-4129
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-4129
> Project: MyFaces Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 2.3.0-beta
> Reporter: Eduardo Breijo
> Attachments: ImplicitELObjects.war, MYFACES-4129.patch
>
>
> When the @javax.faces.annotation.FacesConfig annotation is used in a CDI
> bean, the implicit EL Objects from JSF 2.3 spec section 5.9.2 don't work.
> This is because when that FacesConfig annotation is in a bean we remove the
> implicit EL resolver from the chain so we don't have any mechanism for CDI to
> do the resolution of the implicit objects.
> Tested this on Mojarra and it works fine, with or without @FacesConfig
> annotation.
> A sample app is provided. It can be deployed on tomcat:
> 1) Drive a request to: http://localhost:8080/ImplicitELObjects/index.jsf
> 2) You should see that Application: ApplicationScope: and Component: are
> empty since they cannot be resolved
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
