On 9 Mar 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > stas 2003/03/08 16:16:26 > > Modified: ModPerl-Registry/t basic.t > Log: > add the missing use Apache::TestConfig > > Revision Changes Path > 1.13 +1 -0 modperl-2.0/ModPerl-Registry/t/basic.t > > Index: basic.t > =================================================================== > RCS file: /home/cvs/modperl-2.0/ModPerl-Registry/t/basic.t,v > retrieving revision 1.12 > retrieving revision 1.13 > diff -u -r1.12 -r1.13 > --- basic.t 8 Mar 2003 19:25:10 -0000 1.12 > +++ basic.t 9 Mar 2003 00:16:25 -0000 1.13 > @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ > use Apache::Test; > use Apache::TestUtil; > use Apache::TestRequest qw(GET GET_BODY HEAD); > +use Apache::TestConfig ();
I didn't put that in before, as I realized later Apache::TestConfig is used by Apache::Test, which was already use()d. Would it be good practice though to use it explicitly like this, so as not to rely on, eg, Apache::Test pulling it in? -- best regards, randy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
