[patch] http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=21554

[Fred Moyer]

This seems like a reasonable request.  I know there are a few times
that I had to put the apreq module load in extra.conf.in, and it would
have been nice to have things magically 'just work'.  I only have one
modperl application that does not use libapreq, and I think that I
wouldn't mind the extra module loaded during testing.

OTOH I don't think this qualifies as a 'critical' bug.  But any
thoughts or issues with this patch?

Index: lib/Apache/TestRunPerl.pm
===================================================================
--- lib/Apache/TestRunPerl.pm   (revision 766433)
+++ lib/Apache/TestRunPerl.pm   (working copy)
@@ -73,6 +73,22 @@
         Apache::TestRun::exit_perl(0);
     }

+    if ($rev == 2) {
+        # load apreq2 if it is present
+        # do things a bit differently that find_and_load_module()
+        # because apreq2 can't be loaded that way (the 2 causes a problem)
+        my $name = 'mod_apreq2.so';
+        my $mod_path = $test_config->find_apache_module($name) or return;
+
+        # don't match the 2 here
+        my ($sym) = $name =~ m/mod_(\w+)2\./;
+
+        if ($mod_path && -e $mod_path) {
+            $test_config->preamble(IfModule => "!mod_$sym.c",
+                        qq{LoadModule ${sym}_module "$mod_path"\n});
+        }
+    }
+
     $test_config->preamble_register(qw(configure_libmodperl
                                        configure_env));

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@perl.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@perl.apache.org