Citando Stipe Tolj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Asif Ali wrote: > > > > hello all, > > i am new to this mailing list, i want to know if > > anybody's working on multi-bearer box architecture or > > there are any plans as it was identified as one of the > > key performance bottleneck issues, also the > > persistance of message streams as they pass through > > bearer box. > > hmm, I had that discussion with Alex from Centrium. They run an "one > bearerbox per smsc link" architecture. It is definetly more > performative if you get rid of all the required routing inside > bearerbox if you use a bunch of smsc links inside one bearerbox, but > it's more of theoretical interest. > > We run over 80 links in one bearerbox and fully stable. > > BTW, the performance bottle-neck will be of significanse when you get > beyond 400 Msg/sec. (!) in MT/MO traffic, which I honestly don't > expect you to have ;)
We have only one bearerbox and one smsbox for 16 connections and alot of messages per day, and sometimes I'm scared when I enable a 50msg/sec on one of those connections for doing mass "spam" but then, while I'm sending them, I'm watching and testing the other connections and kannel works like a charm. Please note that usually I use post-xml to enable me to send like 10k destinations at one time, and thus have smsbox processing a xml post with 350KBytes, have the xml processing overhead, and have one smsbox thread creating that many messages in queue. What I mean it's might be a bigger peak processing than having 10k GET's and it works perfectly > > Stipe > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > Wapme Systems AG > > Vogelsanger Weg 80 > 40470 Düsseldorf > > Tel: +49-211-74845-0 > Fax: +49-211-74845-299 > > E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > wapme.net - wherever you are > > -- Davi / Bruno.Rodrigues<at>Litux.Org Litux.org: 13:27:05 up 88 days, 14:42, 2 users, load average: 0.14, 0.15, 0.09 'Linux is obsolete -- Andrew Tanenbaum'
