Hi everyone,

I have started laying the foundations for a new 'box' for Kannel which
intends to allow users more flexibility in terms of the platform.

At the moment there are many ways to get messages into the bearerbox,
namely: smsbox, wapbox, opensmppbox, smppbox, ksmppd, sqlbox. Some rely on
routing in their own process and others allow bearerbox to do the routing.
What they all have in common is they don't allow external or third party
applications help make decisions at processing time (with the exception of
ksmppd/smppbox).

My new planned box is called pluginbox which will basically be like SQLBox
- but instead of using database callbacks, it will allow linking of dynamic
libraries (.so|.dylib) which will allow custom
interception/filtering/modification of message packages to and from various
boxes.

So a hypothetical scenario for this box could be something like

SMSBox, SMPPBox/KSMPPD, WapBox <--> PluginBox <--> Bearerbox

Or even

SMSBox, SMPPBox/KSMPPD, WapBox <--> SQLBox <--> PluginBox <--> Bearerbox

For those who want to still make use of SQLBox.

My initial design is to use an asynchronous callback chain to allow slow
plugins to not hold up the processing of faster messages. This would be
especially useful in the context of people using HTTP and other external
services to process routing decisions. The plugin would also be able to
return a status to 'reject' a message packet which would in turn not submit
to the target receiver.

My plan is also to implement at least one example plugin (probably an HTTP
plugin?) which can show the submission and manipulation of a message packet
in both directions.

So here I am looking for comments.

1) Is this something worthwhile doing, does anyone else have a need for
this?
2) Are there any considerations you wish to add at this time?
3) Are there any features you would like to see added?
4) Would there be any problem including this in the Kannel repository?

Here is the initial version :
https://github.com/donald-jackson/kannel-pluginbox

Thanks Alejandro for SQLBox, its largely based on your code.

Regards,
-- 
Donald Jackson
http://www.ddj.co.za

Reply via email to