Re: [droolers] comparison with JESS

[Dave Bryson]

I think a big difference is that drools
is free and open-source. Jess is NOT!

Performance ( if it is an issue ) can be fixed.

Dave


On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, bob mcwhirter wrote:

> 
> To be honest, no clue.
> 
> JESS still seems non-OO, to me, in that you're still writing
> cambridge-prefix types of rules.  It's interpreted, as
> is the Java Semantic Module of drools, so it may be similar.
> 
> I do think JESS has highly optimized their Rete network,
> though, so they may beat us.
> 
> Someone want to do some benchmarking for us?
> 
>       -bob
>       (the great delegator)
> 
> 
> On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Dhanwa Thirumalai wrote:
> 
> > Another java 'rete' engine JESS is getting popular. How does drools 
> > compare with Jess in terms performance and functionality?
> > 
> > Dhanwa.
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > drools-interest mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/drools-interest
> > 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> drools-interest mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/drools-interest
> 

-- 
Dave Bryson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_______________________________________________
drools-interest mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/drools-interest