But you need to add the route to have communication with another network.
What is the problem?

If your network gateway is the Endian is it then that should be the routes
to other networks.


2013/8/2 Marco Gabriel - inett GmbH <mgabr...@inett.de>

> Understood. I already tried to create a specific rule for ICMP traffic
> within the firewall (exactly at policy based routing). It showed me ICMP 8
> and ICMP 30 to allow, but that didn’t work either.
>
> The only thing that worked so far was adding a route.
>
> Marco
>
> Von: Jonathan Lessa [mailto:jonathanle...@gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Freitag, 2. August 2013 17:33
> An: efw-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Betreff: Re: [Efw-user] Routing and ICMP
>
> But the issue is not the area in itself, but when do you configure a rule
> to redirect the Endian already takes care of creating a rule in the
> firewall to release this communication. What I asked was to test the
> firewall to create a rule allowing ICMP between these networks.
>
> 2013/8/2 Marco Gabriel - inett GmbH <mgabr...@inett.de>
> There are two LANs, connected through two cisco boxes. LAN1 contains
> client and cisco box 1, LAN2 contains endian, server and cisco box 2. There
> is no need to play with the zones as everything for LAN1 should be routed
> through the cisco box 2. And that works for all services but ICMP.
>
> Best regards,
> Marco
>
>
> Von: Jonathan Lessa [mailto:jonathanle...@gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Freitag, 2. August 2013 17:23
> An: efw-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Betreff: Re: [Efw-user] Routing and ICMP
>
> I understood that all involved were on the same LAN green, but in this
> case they are not.
> Outside the routing would be interesting to create a rule in the firewall
> between zones. Releasing the ping between the 192.168.10.0/24 network and
> the Green Zone.
>
> 2013/8/2 Marco Gabriel - inett GmbH <mgabr...@inett.de>
> Endian has 192.168.1.230
> Cisco VPN box 2 has 192.168.1.254
>
> Client has 192.168.10.239
>
> On Endian (or Server): “route add -net 192.168.10.0/24 gw 192.168.1.254”
> → works.
>
> Best regards,
> Marco
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Get your SQL database under version control now!
> Version control is standard for application code, but databases havent
> caught up. So what steps can you take to put your SQL databases under
> version control? Why should you start doing it? Read more to find out.
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=49501711&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> Efw-user mailing list
> Efw-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/efw-user
>



-- 
Att.:
Jonathan Lessa
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get your SQL database under version control now!
Version control is standard for application code, but databases havent 
caught up. So what steps can you take to put your SQL databases under 
version control? Why should you start doing it? Read more to find out.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=49501711&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Efw-user mailing list
Efw-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/efw-user

Reply via email to