Jadi, pemilu kemarin cuma sandiwara doank? :-( Masih ingat keanehan kenaikan
prosentase perolehan suara yang statis, sejak pertama hingga akhir laporan penghitungan suara? Klo gak salah pusat tabulasi perhitungan suara KPU di Hotel Borobudur ya? Dan Carter Center (selaku donatur?) dekat dengan lokasi tersebut? Ada yang bisa koreksi/lengkapi? Thx.. CMIIW.. Wassalam, Irwan.K ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: HINU E. SAYONO Date: Dec 8, 2006 11:39 AM Subject: Bung Karno, Saddam Hussein, dan Nekolim Dalam dunia politik, lokal, nasional, dan internasional, memang tidak dikenal kawan dan lawan permanen. Yang permanen adalah kepentingan, pribadi dan kelompok. Begitu kepentingan pribadi dan kelompok terganggu, Saddam Hussein dianggap musuh. Dan kemudian harus dihabisi. Irak diserbu dan "dijajah". Sumberdaya alam, terutama migas, dijarah habis. Pemerintah Irak yang sekarang adalah sepenuhnya boneka AS. Cerita lama terulang kembali. Dan itu jugalah yang terjadi di Indonesia. Bung Karno digusur. Suharto "dinaikkan". UU PMA diberlakukan, kemudian diliberalisasi. Begitu Suharto makin koruptif, diapun digusur, karena mengganggu kepentingan AS (setoran kepada Tauke Besar berkurang, karena dia memperkaya diri sendiri serta kaluarganya dan kroninya). BJ Habibie "naik", karena bersedia melepas Timor Timur. Tapi dia juga koruptif. Itu bermakna "mengurangi setoran kepada Tauke Besar" lagi pula dia "anak didik" Suharto. Jadi dia cuma sementara saja. Gus Dur "naik", tapi administrasi negara kacau-balau. Karena dia gak tahu apa-apa tentang penyelenggaraan negara dan pemerintahan. Megawati "naik" dengan harapan AS mengambil banyak untung. Namun Megawati tidak memberikan kepastian tentang perpanjangan kontrak pertambangan di Timika, tidak memberikan kepastian tentang blok Cepu dan blok Ambalat, dan bersama Malaysia menolak partisipasi AS dalam pengamanan Selat Malaka, serta menolak penyelesaian persoalan Aceh sesuai dengan "petunjuk dan pengarahan" AS. Maka naiklah SBY. Dan semua keinginan AS dipenuhi. Beres!!! Pilpres hanyalah sandiwara kolosal. Peran Carter Center sangat menonjol. Silakan baca artikel James Petras tentang peran Carter Center dalam "merecoki" pemilihan umum di beberapa negara. Itulah neo-kolonialisme dan neo-imperialisme alias nekolim. *Oil for **Sale**: Iraq Study Group Recommends Privatization* * * By Antonia Juhasz, AlterNetPosted on December 7, 2006, Printed on December 7, 2006 *http://www.alternet.org/story/45190/* In its heavily anticipated report released on Wednesday, the Iraq Study Group made at least four truly radical proposals. The report calls for the United States *to assist in privatizing Iraq's national oil industry*, *opening Iraq to private foreign oil and energy companies*, *providing direct technical assistance for the "drafting" of a new national oil law for Iraq*, and *assuring that all of Iraq's oil revenues accrue to the central government*. President Bush hired an employee from the U.S. consultancy firm *Bearing Point Inc.* over a year ago *to advise the Iraq Oil Ministry on the drafting and passage of a new national oil law*. As previously drafted, the law opens Iraq's nationalized oil sector to private foreign corporate investment, but stops short of full privatization. The ISG report, however, goes further, stating *that "the **United States** should assist Iraqi leaders to reorganize the national oil industry as a commercial enterprise."* In addition, the current Constitution of Iraq is ambiguous as to whether control over Iraq's oil should be shared among its regional provinces or held under the central government. The report specifically recommends the latter: *"Oil revenues should accrue to the central government and be shared on the basis of population."* If these proposals are followed, *Iraq**'s national oil industry will be privatized and opened to foreign firms*, and *in control of all of **Iraq**'s oil wealth*. The proposals should come as little surprise given that two authors of the report, *James A. Baker III* *and Lawrence Eagleburger*, have each spent much of their political and corporate careers in pursuit of greater access to Iraq's oil and wealth. *"Pragmatist"* is the word most often used to describe Iraq Study Group co-chair James A. Baker III. It is equally appropriate for Lawrence Eagleburger. The term applies particularly well to each man's efforts to expand U.S. economic engagement with Saddam Hussein throughout the 1980s and early 1990s. Not only did their efforts enrich Hussein and U.S. corporations, particularly oil companies, it also served *the interests of their own private firms*. On April 21,1990, a U.S. delegation was sent to Iraq to placate Saddam Hussein as his anti-American rhetoric and threats of a Kuwaiti invasion intensified. James A. Baker III, then President George H.W. Bush's secretary of state, personally sent a cable to the U.S embassy in Baghdad instructing the U.S. ambassador to meet with Hussein and to make clear that, *"as concerned as we are about Iraq's* *chemical, nuclear, and missile programs, we are not in any sense preparing the way for preemptive military unilateral effort to eliminate these programs."** Instead, Baker's interest was focused on trade, which he described as the "central factor in the U.S-Iraq relationship." From 1982, when Reagan removed Iraq from the list of countries supporting terrorism, until August 1990, when Iraq invaded Kuwait, Baker and Eagleburger worked with others in the Reagan and Bush administrations to aggressively and successfully expand this trade. The efficacy of such a move may best be described in a memo written in 1988 by the Bush transition team arguing that the United States would have "to decide whether to treat Iraq as a distasteful dictatorship to be shunned where possible, or to recognize Iraq's present and potential power in the region and accord it relatively high priority. We strongly urge the latter view." Two reasons offered were Iraq's "vast oil reserves," which promised "a lucrative market for U.S. goods," and the fact that U.S. oil imports from Iraq were skyrocketing. Bush and Baker took the transition team's advice and ran with it. In fact, from 1983 to 1989, annual trade between the United States and Iraq grew nearly sevenfold and was expected to double in 1990, before Iraq invaded Kuwait. In 1989, Iraq became the United States' second-largest trading partner in the Middle East: Iraq purchased *$5.2 billion* in U.S. exports, while the U.S. bought $5.5 billion in Iraqi petroleum. From 1987 to July 1990, U.S. imports of Iraqi oil increased from 80,000 to *1.1 million barrels* per day. Eagleburger and Baker had much to do with that skyrocketing trade. In December 1983, then undersecretary of state Eagleburger wrote the U.S. Export-Import Bank to personally urge it to begin extending loans to Iraq to "signal our belief in the future viability of the Iraqi economy and secure a U.S. foothold in a potentially large export market." He noted that Iraq "has plans well advanced for an additional 50 percent increase in its oil exports by the end of 1984." Ultimately, billions of loans would be made or backed by the U.S. government to the Iraqi dictator, money used by Hussein to purchase U.S. goods. In 1984, Baker became treasury secretary, Reagan opened full diplomatic relations with Iraq, and Eagleburger became president of Henry Kissinger's corporate consultancy firm, Kissinger Associates. Kissinger Associates participated in the U.S.-Iraq Business Forum through managing director Alan Stoga. The Forum was a trade association representing some 60 American companies, including Bechtel, Lockheed, Texaco, Exxon, Mobil, and Hunt Oil. The Iraqi ambassador to the United States told a Washington, D.C., audience in 1985, "Our people in Baghdad will give priority -- when there is a competition between two companies -- to the one that is a member of the Forum." Stoga appeared regularly at Forum events and traveled to Iraq on a Forum-sponsored trip in 1989 during which he met directly with Hussein. Many Kissinger clients were also members of the Forum and became recipients of contracts with Hussein. In 1989, Eagleburger returned to the state department now under Secretary Baker. That same year, President Bush signed National Security Directive 26 stating, "We should pursue, and seek to facilitate, opportunities for U.S.firms to participate in the reconstruction of the Iraqi economy, particularly in the energy area." The president then began discussions of a $1 billion loan guarantee for Iraqone week before Secretary Baker met with Tariq Aziz at the state department to seal the deal. But once Hussein invaded Kuwait, all bets were off. Baker made a public plea for support of military action against Hussein, arguing, "The economic lifeline of the industrial world runs from the Gulf and we cannot permit a dictator such as this to sit astride that economic lifeline." Baker had much to gain from increased access to Iraq's oil. According to author Robert Bryce, Baker and his immediate family's personal investments in the oil industry at the time of the first Gulf War included investments in Amoco, Exxon and Texaco. The family law firm, Baker Botts, has represented Texaco, Exxon, Halliburton and Conoco Phillips, among other companies, in some cases since 1914 and in many cases for decades. (Eagleburger is also connected to Halliburton, having only recently departed the company's board of directors). Baker is a longtime associate and now senior partner of Baker Botts, which this year, for the second year running, was recipient of "The International Who's Who of Business Lawyers Oil & Gas Law Firm of the Year Award," while the Middle East remains a central focus of the firm. This past July, U.S. Energy Secretary Bodman announced in Baghdad that senior U.S. oil company executives would not enter Iraq without passage of the new law. Petroleum Economist magazine later reported that U.S. oil companies put passage of the oil law before security concerns as the deciding factor over their entry into Iraq. Put simply, the oil companies are trying to get what they were denied before the war or at anytime in modern Iraqi history: access to Iraq's oil under the ground. They are also trying to get the best deal possible out of a war-ravaged and occupied nation. However, waiting for the law's passage and the need to guarantee security of U.S. firms once they get to work, may well be a key factor driving the one proposal by the Iraq Study Group that has received great media attention: extending the presence of U.S. troops in Iraq at least until 2008. As the recommendations of the Iraq Study Group are more thoroughly considered, we should remain ever vigilant and wary of corporate war profiteers in pragmatist's clothing. *All quotes are referenced in my book, *"The Bush Agenda."* *Antonia Juhasz* is a visiting scholar at the Institute for Policy Studies, author of "The Bush Agenda: Invading the World, One Economy at a Time," and a contributing author, with John Perkins and others, of "A Game as Old as Empire: The Secret World of Economic Hit Men and the Web of Global Corruption." www.TheBushAgenda.net <http://thebushagenda.net/>. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
