Big point.
Once he releases the source code under GPL he has no recourse. These
developers can take his source code, do exactly what they want to it,
and don't even have to change the name of the application.
If the program was written with GPL tools, compilers, libraries, dll's,
etc..., as WSJT-X was, he is required to release the code.
He can charge for bis version of the program and charge for support. He
does have control over what makes it into his version. Other than that nope.
<sarcasm> It's about time Elecraft released their code under GPL so
pimple faced kids living in Mom's basement with no visible means of
support, can write "some really cool stuff" for the Elecraft products.
</sarcasm>
On 5/28/2017 2:38 AM, Jim Brown wrote:
On Sun,5/28/2017 12:18 AM, Richard Lamont wrote:
I agree with all of that, except the 'unauthorized' bit.
Joe has posted on that topic. The executive summary is that he is not
happy with the way in which some of those other developers have failed
to respect his license.
73, Jim K9YC
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to ksto...@ac0h.net
--
R. Kevin Stover AC0H
FISTS #11993
SKCC #215
NAQCC #3441
ARRL
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
