election-methods-list  

Messages by Date

• 2002/12/08 Re: [EM] Power of votes with approval Adam Tarr
• 2002/12/08 Re: [EM] Power of votes with approval Adam Tarr
• 2002/12/08 Re: [EM] Quantifying manipulability Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• 2002/12/08 [EM] "1 person - 1 vote" Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• 2002/12/08 [EM] Power of votes with approval Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• 2002/12/08 RE: [EM] Need IRV examples; voting show James Gilmour
• 2002/12/08 [EM] Cancelling a vote in Approval Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• 2002/12/08 RE: [EM] Need IRV examples; voting show Olli Salmi
• 2002/12/07 RE: [EM] Need IRV examples; voting show Adam Tarr
• 2002/12/07 Re: [EM] Gilmour: Approval Markus Schulze
• 2002/12/07 RE: [EM] Need IRV examples; voting show James Gilmour
• 2002/12/07 Re: [EM] Approval and '1 person/1 vote' Alex Small
• 2002/12/07 RE: [EM] Need IRV examples; voting show James Gilmour
• 2002/12/07 Re: [EM] Need IRV examples; voting show Dave Ketchum
• 2002/12/07 [EM] Approval and "1 person/1 vote" Adam Tarr
• 2002/12/06 [EM] Gilmour: Approval MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/12/06 Re: [EM] Need IRV examples; voting show Bart Ingles
• 2002/12/06 RE: [EM] Need IRV examples; voting show James Gilmour
• 2002/12/06 Re: [EM] Quantifying manipulability Forest Simmons
• 2002/12/06 [EM] software Narins, Josh
• 2002/12/06 [EM] Steph: Your criterion MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/12/05 [EM] Majority rule meaning, continued MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/12/05 Re: [EM] Quantifying manipulability barnes99
• 2002/12/05 [EM] Thoughts on Majority Criterion Alex Small
• 2002/12/05 Re: [EM] Quantifying manipulability Forest Simmons
• 2002/12/05 Re: Other Criteria Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• 2002/12/05 [EM] Blake: Majority meanings MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/12/04 Re: Other Criteria MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/12/04 Re: Approval vs Plurality? MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/12/04 Re: [EM] Approval vs Plurality? Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• 2002/12/04 [EM] Other criterias Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• 2002/12/04 Re: [EM] Quantifying manipulability Alex Small
• 2002/12/04 Re: [EM] Quantifying manipulability Forest Simmons
• 2002/12/04 Re: [EM] Quantifying manipulability Alex Small
• 2002/12/04 Re: [EM] Quantifying manipulability Alex Small
• 2002/12/04 Re: [EM] Quantifying manipulability Adam Tarr
• 2002/12/04 [EM] Quantifying manipulability barnes99
• 2002/12/04 [EM] Kinds of majority? MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/12/03 Re: [EM] Candidate Proxy Methods (fwd) Forest Simmons
• 2002/12/03 Re: [EM] The Copeland/Borda wv hybrid (fwd) Forest Simmons
• 2002/12/03 Re: [EM] Random ranking, & other bogies Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• 2002/12/02 [EM] Approval vs Plurality? MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/12/02 [EM] Candidate Proxy Methods (fwd) Forest Simmons
• 2002/12/02 Re: [EM] Steph--One more thing re: voting power Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• 2002/12/02 Re: [EM] The Copeland/Borda wv hybrid Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• 2002/12/02 Re: [EM] Voting Power Clarification Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• 2002/12/02 RE: [EM] Sports and 'The Condorcet Mindset' Alex Small
• 2002/12/02 RE: [EM] Sports and 'The Condorcet Mindset' Adam Tarr
• 2002/12/02 RE: [EM] Sports and 'The Condorcet Mindset' Narins, Josh
• 2002/12/02 RE: [EM] Sports and 'The Condorcet Mindset' barnes99
• 2002/12/01 Re: CR vs Condorcet MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/11/30 [EM] Defense against order-reversal MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/11/29 [EM] Democrat-Dumping MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/11/29 Re: [EM] CR vs. Condorcet Forest Simmons
• 2002/11/29 Re: [EM] Need IRV examples; voting show Bart Ingles
• 2002/11/28 Re: Probabilities Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• 2002/11/28 Re: [EM] Probability of losing a sincere Cond. Winner Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• 2002/11/28 Re: [EM] Dealing With Democrats Isabel and Christopher Dicely
• 2002/11/28 Re: [EM] Random ranking, & other bogies Blake Cretney
• 2002/11/28 [EM] CR vs. Condorcet Douglas Greene
• 2002/11/27 [EM] Random ranking, & other bogies MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/11/27 [EM] Kuro5hin article on IRV Rob Lanphier
• 2002/11/27 [EM] Matt: voting power with more candidates MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/11/27 Re: [EM] The Copeland/Borda wv hybrid Forest Simmons
• 2002/11/26 Re: [EM] Steph--One more thing re: voting power matt
• 2002/11/26 [EM] The Copeland/Borda wv hybrid Forest Simmons
• 2002/11/26 [EM] Dealing With Democrats MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/11/26 [EM] Voting Power Clarification MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/11/26 [EM] Why protect voter-median candidates: MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/11/25 Re: Probabilities MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/11/25 [EM] Steph: Truncation, 11/25/02 MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/11/25 Re: [EM] Probability of losing a sincere Cond. Winner matt
• 2002/11/25 Re: [EM] Probability of losing a sincere Cond. Winner Adam H Tarr
• 2002/11/25 [EM]Probabilities Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• 2002/11/25 Re: [EM] Steph: Truncation example Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• 2002/11/25 [EM] Probability of losing a sincere Cond. Winner Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• 2002/11/24 [EM] Steph: wv vs relative margins MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/11/24 Re: [EM] Steph--One more thing re: voting power Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• 2002/11/24 Re: [EM] Steph: 3-level voting Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• 2002/11/24 [EM] Steph: Truncation example MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/11/24 Re: [EM]Ranked-Pairs (wv) can lose a Cond. Winner Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• 2002/11/24 Re: [EM]Ranked-Pairs (wv) can lose a Cond. Winner Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• 2002/11/24 Re: [EM]Ranked-Pairs (wv) can lose a Cond. Winner Adam Tarr
• 2002/11/24 Re: [EM]Ranked-Pairs (wv) can lose a Cond. Winner matt
• 2002/11/24 Re: [EM] Can we help this brother out? (fwd) Blake Cretney
• 2002/11/24 Re: [EM] Steph, re: CW example Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• 2002/11/24 Re: [EM]Ranked-Pairs (wv) can lose a Cond. Winner Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• 2002/11/23 [EM] Steph--One more thing re: voting power MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/11/23 Re: Yes/No Voting MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/11/23 [EM] Steph: 3-level voting MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/11/23 [EM] Steph, re: CW example MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/11/23 [EM] Re; Ranked-Pairs (wv) can lose a Cond. Winner MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/11/23 Re: [EM] margins vs wv Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• 2002/11/23 [EM] Ranked pairs (wv) can lose a Cond. Winner Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• 2002/11/23 Re: [EM] margins vs wv Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• 2002/11/23 [EM] 3-level voting Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• 2002/11/23 Re: [EM] Yes/No Voting Alex Small
• 2002/11/23 [EM] Yes/No Voting MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/11/22 Re: IRV vs Condorcet Voting Methods MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/11/22 [EM] margins vs wv MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/11/22 Re: [EM] Sports and 'The Condorcet Mindset' Forest Simmons
• 2002/11/22 [EM] misspelled name apology Forest Simmons
• 2002/11/22 Re: Questions Alex Small
• 2002/11/22 Re: Questions Alex Small
• 2002/11/22 Re: Questions Joe Weinstein
• 2002/11/21 [EM] Can we help this brother out? (fwd) Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• 2002/11/21 Re: [EM] More Condorcet Flavored PR examples Forest Simmons
• 2002/11/21 [EM] Can we help this brother out? (fwd) douggreene
• 2002/11/20 [EM] Greetings! and an update Douglas Greene
• 2002/11/20 Re: [EM] More Condorcet Flavored PR examples Forest Simmons
• 2002/11/20 Re: [EM] More Condorcet Flavored PR examples matt
• 2002/11/20 Re: [EM] questions Alex Small
• 2002/11/20 [EM] questions Forest Simmons
• 2002/11/20 Re: [EM] More Condorcet Flavored PR examples Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• 2002/11/20 Re: [EM] More Condorcet Flavored PR examples Forest Simmons
• 2002/11/19 [EM] doh! Alex Small
• 2002/11/19 RE: [EM] D'Hondt without lists Forest Simmons
• 2002/11/19 [EM] IRV vs Condorcet Voting Methods Dave Ketchum
• 2002/11/18 RE: [EM] Math Question Narins, Josh
• 2002/11/18 Re: [EM] Math Question Alex Small
• 2002/11/18 RE: [EM] NYTimes.com Article: A Third Party on the Right Narins, Josh
• 2002/11/18 Re: [EM] Sports and 'The Condorcet Mindset' Michael Rouse
• 2002/11/18 RE: [EM] Sports and 'The Condorcet Mindset' Narins, Josh
• 2002/11/18 RE: [EM] Sports and "The Condorcet Mindset" Narins, Josh
• 2002/11/18 [EM] Math Question Narins, Josh
• 2002/11/18 [EM] letter to Salon.com Alex Small
• 2002/11/18 Re: [EM] Sports and 'The Condorcet Mindset' Alex Small
• 2002/11/17 [EM] Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare Bart Ingles
• 2002/11/17 Re: [EM] Sports and "The Condorcet Mindset" matt
• 2002/11/17 Re: [EM] Sports and 'The Condorcet Mindset' Bart Ingles
• 2002/11/17 Re: [EM] Sports and "The Condorcet Mindset" Adam Tarr
• 2002/11/17 Re: [EM] Sports and 'The Condorcet Mindset' Alex Small
• 2002/11/17 [EM] Sports and "The Condorcet Mindset" Alex Small
• 2002/11/17 Re: [EM] NYTimes.com Article: A Third Party on the Right Alex Small
• 2002/11/16 RE: [EM] D'Hondt without lists Olli Salmi
• 2002/11/15 Re: [EM] More Condorcet Flavored PR examples Forest Simmons
• 2002/11/14 [EM] [Fwd: Fair Elections Update: Election 2002 and the Case for Reform] Alex Small
• 2002/11/14 RE: [EM] D'Hondt without lists Olli Salmi
• 2002/11/13 [EM] More Condorcet Flavored PR examples Forest Simmons
• 2002/11/13 Re: [EM] Relevance of Consistency Forest Simmons
• 2002/11/12 Re: [EM] Condorcet Flavored PR Methods Forest Simmons
• 2002/11/11 [EM] "Election Selection," Science News Online, Nov. 2, 2002 Steve Barney
• 2002/11/11 Re: [EM] Nov. 2002 Libertarian Solutions and IRV Alex Small
• 2002/11/11 Re: [EM] Nov. 2002 Libertarian Solutions and IRV Dave Ketchum
• 2002/11/11 Re: [EM] Nov. 2002 Libertarian Solutions and IRV Alex Small
• 2002/11/11 [EM] Nov. 2002 Libertarian Solutions and IRV Douglas Greene
• 2002/11/09 [EM] Corrected definitions MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/11/09 [EM] Definitions of majority rule, defensive strategy, offensive strategy MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/11/09 Re: 11/08/02 - RE: [EM] Need IRV examples - Voting Show: Blake Cretney
• 2002/11/09 Re: [EM] Relevance of Consistency Blake Cretney
• 2002/11/09 11/08/02 - RE: [EM] Need IRV examples - Voting Show: Donald E Davison
• 2002/11/08 Re: Relevance of Consistency MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/11/08 Re: [EM] Relevance of Consistency Blake Cretney
• 2002/11/08 Re: Relevance of Consistency Blake Cretney
• 2002/11/08 Re: [EM] Condorcet Flavored PR Methods Forest Simmons
• 2002/11/07 Re: [EM] Condorcet Flavored PR Methods Forest Simmons
• 2002/11/07 Re: [EM] Condorcet Flavored PR Methods Forest Simmons
• 2002/11/07 Re: [EM] Condorcet Flavored PR Methods Forest Simmons
• 2002/11/07 [EM] Strong FBC, Majority, non-monotonicity, and stability Alex Small
• 2002/11/07 Re: [EM] Condorcet Flavored PR Methods Adam Tarr
• 2002/11/06 Re: [EM] Condorcet Flavored PR Methods Adam Tarr
• 2002/11/06 Re: Relevance of Consistency MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/11/06 Re: [EM] Relevance of Consistency Forest Simmons
• 2002/11/06 Re: [EM] Condorcet Violates Strong FBC Forest Simmons
• 2002/11/06 Re: [EM] Condorcet Violates Strong FBC Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• 2002/11/06 Re: [EM] Condorcet Violates Strong FBC Forest Simmons
• 2002/11/06 Re: Lying about FBC Alex Small
• 2002/11/05 Re: [EM] Condorcet Violates Strong FBC Forest Simmons
• 2002/11/05 [EM] 11/05/02 - Tom, Help has Arrived: Donald E Davison
• 2002/11/04 Re: [EM] Relevance of Consistency Blake Cretney
• 2002/11/04 Re: [EM] Condorcet Violates Strong FBC Alex Small
• 2002/11/04 Re: [EM] Condorcet Violates Strong FBC Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• 2002/11/04 [EM] Condorcet Violates Strong FBC Alex Small
• 2002/11/03 [EM] Typo in "Relevance of Consistency" MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/11/03 [EM] Relevance of Consistency MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/11/03 [EM] Election article on Slashdot Rob Lanphier
• 2002/11/03 RE: [EM] Need IRV examples; voting show James Gilmour
• 2002/11/03 RE: [EM] Need IRV examples; voting show James Gilmour
• 2002/11/03 Re: [EM] Need IRV examples; voting show Bart Ingles
• 2002/11/03 Re: [EM] Strong FBC Can Be Satisfied By Ranked Methods! (sort of) Dave Ketchum
• 2002/11/03 Re: [EM] Need IRV examples; voting show Bart Ingles
• 2002/11/03 Re: [EM] Need IRV examples; voting show Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• 2002/11/03 RE: [EM] Need IRV examples; voting show James Gilmour
• 2002/11/02 [EM] IRV nonmonotonicity examples MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/11/02 [EM] More to Tom Mull, re: IRV MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/11/02 [EM] More to Tom Mull, re: IRV MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2002/11/02 Re: [EM] Strong FBC, Majority Rule, and Condorcet Alex Small
• 2002/11/02 Re: [EM] Strong FBC, Majority Rule, and Condorcet Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• 2002/11/01 [EM] Strong FBC, Majority Rule, and Condorcet Alex Small
• 2002/11/01 Re: [EM] Need IRV examples; voting show Forest Simmons
• 2002/10/31 Re: [EM] Strong FBC Can Be Satisfied By Ranked Methods! (sort of) Alex Small
• 2002/10/31 Re: [EM] Strong FBC Can Be Satisfied By Ranked Methods! (sort of) Forest Simmons
• 2002/10/31 RE: [EM] Progress on strong FBC James Gilmour
• 2002/10/31 [EM] Strong FBC Can Be Satisfied By Ranked Methods! (sort of) Alex Small
• 2002/10/31 [EM] Progress on strong FBC Alex Small
• 2002/10/31 Re: Reply to Tom Mull, re: IRV Alex Small
• 2002/10/30 [EM] election administration Alex Small
• 2002/10/30 Re: Reply to Tom Mull, re: IRV Tom Mull
• 2002/10/30 [EM] Need IRV examples; voting show Rob LeGrand
• 2002/10/26 Re: [EM] Monotonicity and the Muller-Satterthwaite Theorem matt

• Earlier messages
• Later messages