election-methods  

Messages by Thread

• [EM] Co-operation/defection in perspective Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Juho,5/25/12, roughly 2230 UT Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Juho,5/25/12, roughly 2230 UT Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] Juho,5/25/12, roughly 2230 UT Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] full-ranking SODA: FBC compliant Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] full-ranking SODA: FBC compliant Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Two completely different kinds of voting reforms. ICT vs Condorcet. Michael Ossipoff
• Re: [EM] Juho , 5/21/12, roughly 0800 UT Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] Juho , 5/21/12, roughly 0800 UT Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] Juho , 5/21/12, roughly 0800 UT Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Juho , 5/21/12, roughly 0800 UT Juho Laatu
• [EM] Typo. Plurality strategy, not Approval strategy, is a difficult problem. Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Kristofer, contd. Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Clarification and correction about u/a strategy Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Concerns of KM & RF. Approval, Condorcet & ICT strategy. Reform schedule. Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Concerns of KM & RF. Approval, Condorcet & ICT strategy. Reform schedule. Dave Ketchum
• [EM] C/D resistant Condorcet methods. Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] C/D resistant Condorcet methods. Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Ok, the subject here is a waste of time. Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] To Condorcetists: Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] To Condorcetists: Paul Kislanko
  • Re: [EM] To Condorcetists: robert bristow-johnson
  • Re: [EM] To Condorcetists: Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] To Condorcetists: Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] To Condorcetists: Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] To Condorcetists: Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] To Condorcetists: Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] To Condorcetists: Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] To Condorcetists: Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] To Condorcetists: Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] To Condorcetists: Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] To Condorcetists: Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] To Condorcetists: Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] To Condorcetists: Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] To Condorcetists: Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] To Condorcetists: Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] To Condorcetists: Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] To Condorcetists: Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] To Condorcetists: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] To Condorcetists: Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] To Condorcetists: Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] To Condorcetists: Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] To Condorcetists: Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] To Condorcetists: Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] To Condorcetists: Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] To Condorcetists: Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] To Condorcetists: Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] To Condorcetists: Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Completely different reasons for and purposes of method advocacy. Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] u/a for criteria. u/a FBC. Voter's Choice. SSCS. Strong FBC. Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] u/a for criteria. u/a FBC. Voter's Choice. SSCS. Strong FBC. Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] u/a for criteria. u/a FBC. Voter's Choice. SSCS. Strong FBC. Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] u/a for criteria. u/a FBC. Voter's Choice. SSCS. Strong FBC. Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] New popularization article Rémi
• [EM] Comments on a few things said by Richard & Robert, May 10, '12 Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Smith-Top Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Smith-Top Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• Re: [EM] ? about your reply to Rarity, FBC, Condorcet, comparison of criteria Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] CC, Co-operation/Defection, definitions of Approval and VoteFair Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] "FBC vs Condorcet's Criterion" Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] "FBC vs Condorcet's Criterion" Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] "FBC vs Condorcet's Criterion" Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] "FBC vs Condorcet's Criterion" Michael Ossipoff
• Re: [EM] [Urgent] Information about M. Schulze Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Richard reply, 5/7/12 Michael Ossipoff
  • [EM] Rarity, FBC, Condorcet, comparison of criteria Richard Fobes
  • Re: [EM] Rarity, FBC, Condorcet, comparison of criteria Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] Rarity, FBC, Condorcet, comparison of criteria Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Rarity, FBC, Condorcet, comparison of criteria Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Rarity, FBC, Condorcet, comparison of criteria Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Could we work on enactment-feasibility instead of jealous, self-serving infighting? Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Rebuttal to article by Mike Ossipoff Adrian Tawfik
  • [EM] Articles for Democracy Chronicles Richard Fobes
• [EM] Sincere voting definition: falsifying instead of contradicting a preference Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Typo in Condorcet's Criterion definition Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] A solution that wouldn't bring debate to Democracy Chronicles Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Rebuttal to article by Mike Ossipoff Richard Fobes
  • Re: [EM] Rebuttal to article by Mike Ossipoff Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Rebuttal to article by Mike Ossipoff Richard Fobes
  • Re: [EM] Rebuttal to article by Mike Ossipoff robert bristow-johnson
  • Re: [EM] Rebuttal to article by Mike Ossipoff Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] I retract my praise of Approval-Fill-In. It spoils ICT's defection-resistance. Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Kristofer: Addenda Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Kristofer, April 3, '12, Approval vs Condorcet Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Kristofer, April 3, '12, Approval vs Condorcet Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Kristofer, April 3, '12, Approval vs Condorcet Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Kristofer, April 3, '12, Approval vs Condorcet Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Kristofer, April 3, '12, Approval vs Condorcet Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] Kristofer, April 3, '12, Approval vs Condorcet Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] Kristofer, April 3, '12, Approval vs Condorcet Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] Kristofer, April 3, '12, Approval vs Condorcet Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] Kristofer, April 3, '12, Approval vs Condorcet Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Kristofer, April 3, '12, Approval vs Condorcet robert bristow-johnson
  • Re: [EM] Kristofer, April 3, '12, Approval vs Condorcet Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Approval-Fill-In--Always an improvement, and an option in Approval. Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Democracy Chronicles, introductions - Michael Allan Adrian Tawfik
• [EM] an extra step for IRV (and some other methods?) C.Benham
  • Re: [EM] an extra step for IRV (and some other methods?) Michael Ossipoff
• Re: [EM] Mike: Count issues - learn English Paul Kislanko
  • Re: [EM] Mike: Count issues - learn English robert bristow-johnson
  • Re: [EM] Mike: Count issues - learn English Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Paul, Monday, 4/30/12 Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Paul: Count issues. Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Jameson: Posting about a person instead of about the topic Michael Ossipoff
• Re: [EM] Mike: read my original post and the follow-on that gave a few concrete examples Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Second (and higher)-order methods? Paul Kislanko
  • Re: [EM] Second (and higher)-order methods? robert bristow-johnson
  • Re: [EM] Second (and higher)-order methods? Paul Kislanko
  • Re: [EM] Second (and higher)-order methods? robert bristow-johnson
  • Re: [EM] Second (and higher)-order methods? Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Paul: Could you be more specific about exactly what your concern is? Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] How would Condorcet himself have solved his paradox? Rémi
  • Re: [EM] How would Condorcet himself have solved his paradox? Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] How would Condorcet himself have solved his paradox? Ted Stern
  • Re: [EM] How would Condorcet himself have solved his paradox? Markus Schulze
• [EM] Oops! Wrong name again. Apologies. Michael Ossipoff
• Re: [EM] Mike: Repeating my observation that you didn't answer my main question Paul Kislanko
  • Re: [EM] Mike: Repeating my observation that you didn't answer my main question Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Richard: Approval vs Condorcet. Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Richard: Approval vs Condorcet. Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] Richard: Approval vs Condorcet. Richard Fobes
  • Re: [EM] Richard: Approval vs Condorcet. Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Richard: Approval vs Condorcet. robert bristow-johnson
• [EM] Paul: Repeating my answer about what would be counted Michael Ossipoff
• Re: [EM] Paul: Counts Paul Kislanko
  • Re: [EM] Paul: Counts robert bristow-johnson
  • Re: [EM] Paul: Counts Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• Re: [EM] Dave Ketchum: Repetition of previoius Approval discussion Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Kristofer: Approval vs Condorcet, 4/28/12 Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Kristofer: Approval vs Condorcet, 4/28/12 Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] Kristofer: Approval vs Condorcet, 4/28/12 Paul Kislanko
  • Re: [EM] Kristofer: Approval vs Condorcet, 4/28/12 robert bristow-johnson
  • Re: [EM] Kristofer: Approval vs Condorcet, 4/28/12 Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] Kristofer: Approval vs Condorcet, 4/28/12 Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • [EM] (Let's try that again) Re: Kristofer: Approval vs Condorcet, 4/28/12 Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Democracy Chronicles, introductions Adrian Tawfik
  • Re: [EM] Democracy Chronicles, introductions Richard Fobes
  • [EM] Democracy Chronicles, introductions Adrian Tawfik
• [EM] Dave Ketchum: Handcounts Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Dave Ketchum: Handcounts Paul Kislanko
  • Re: [EM] Dave Ketchum: Handcounts Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] Dave Ketchum: Handcounts Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Dave Ketchum: Handcounts Paul Kislanko
  • Re: [EM] Dave Ketchum: Handcounts Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] Dave Ketchum: Handcounts Paul Kislanko
  • Re: [EM] Handcounts Juho Laatu
• [EM] Election layering effect (or why election-method reform is important) Richard Fobes
  • Re: [EM] Election layering effect (or why election-method reform is important) Ted Stern
  • Re: [EM] Election layering effect (or why election-method reform is important) Richard Fobes
  • Re: [EM] Election layering effect (or why election-method reform is important) Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Election layering effect (or why election-method reform is important) Stéphane Rouillon
  • Re: [EM] Election layering effect (or why election-method reform is important) Stéphane Rouillon
• [EM] Kristofer: Yes, maybe Condorcet could overcome its disadvantages. Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Kristofer: Yes, maybe Condorcet could overcome its disadvantages. Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Kristofer: Yes, maybe Condorcet could overcome its disadvantages. robert bristow-johnson
• [EM] Article with some wording improvements, and ommissions fixed. Michael Ossipoff
  • [EM] as to Favorite vs Compromise vs Worse. Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Cubicle society Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Cubicle-society. Withdrawing Intermediate FBC-2. Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Cubicle-society. Withdrawing Intermediate FBC-2. Michael Allan
  • Re: [EM] Cubicle-society. Withdrawing Intermediate FBC-2. Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Kristofer, re: ICT and Approval, part 2 Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Kristofer, re; ICT and Approval, part 1 Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] The article plan sounds fine to me. Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Version 2: Without the word "alone" Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Much clearer and best yet Intermediate FBC definition--probably final definition of Intermediate FBC. Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] An Intermediate FBC more in keeping with Weak and Strong FBCs Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Definitions of FBC, Strong FBC, and Intermediate FBC. Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Kristofer: Defection-resistance. Strong FBC. Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] ICT Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] ICT definition. Presumed Kemeny definition. Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] ICT definition. Presumed Kemeny definition. Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] ICT definition. Presumed Kemeny definition. Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] ICT definition. Presumed Kemeny definition. Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Dave: We agree about the first step. Jameson: RP vs Beatpath Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Schulze vs. RP Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Schulze vs. RP Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Democracy Chronicles, introductions Richard Fobes
  • Re: [EM] Democracy Chronicles, introductions Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Democracy Chronicles, introductions Richard Fobes
  • Re: [EM] Democracy Chronicles, introductions Andy Jennings
  • Re: [EM] Democracy Chronicles, introductions Richard Fobes
  • [EM] Mathematical equivalence (was Re: Democracy Chronicles, introductions) Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Mathematical equivalence (was Re: Democracy Chronicles, introductions) Richard Fobes
  • [EM] Democracy Chronicles, introductions - Michael Allan Michael Allan
• [EM] Article, with the added paragraph and some better wording. Michael Ossipoff
  • [EM] Democracy Chronicles, introductions Adrian Tawfik
  • [EM] Election thinking, Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] Election thinking, Adrian Tawfik
  • Re: [EM] Election thinking, Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] Election thinking, Michael Ossipoff
  • [EM] Election thinking, Adrian Tawfik
• [EM] Democracy Chronicles Interview Articles Adrian Tawfik
  • Re: [EM] Democracy Chronicles Interview Articles Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Dave, IRV, 4/20/12 Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Dave, IRV, 4/20/12 Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Correction: "Smith set" instead of "winning set" Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Correction: "Smith set" instead of "winning set" Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Public political election methods for different electorates and societies (mostly Fantasy Land). CT method. Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] The 99% Declaration, proposal to ban single-mark ballots from U.S. Congressional elections Richard Fobes

• Earlier messages