election-methods  

Messages by Thread

• [EM] Chicken Dilemma--To whom is it a problem? Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Properties & their justification. Conditions. Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Ranking of Greeen-scenario methods. Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Part 3: Beatpath & Ranked-Pairs Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Part 2: Property-Requirements & Best Methods for Green scenario. Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Plurality Strategy. Beatpath & Ranked-Pairs. Best Rank Methods. Michael Ossipoff
• Re: [EM] MMPO(IA>MPO) (was IA/MMPO) Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] MMPO(IA>MPO) (was IA/MMPO) Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] MMPO(IA>MPO) (was IA/MMPO) Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] MMPO(IA>MPO) (was IA/MMPO) correction Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] MMPO(IA>MPO) (was IA/MMPO) Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] MMPO(IA>MPO) (was IA/MMPO) Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] MMPO(IA>MPO) (was IA/MMPO) Kevin Venzke
• [EM] IA/MPO Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] IA/MPO Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] IA/MPO Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] IA/MPO Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] IA/MPO Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] IA/MPO Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] IA/MPO Forest Simmons
• [EM] Try this method on your favorite election scenario Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Try this method on your favorite election scenario Kevin Venzke
• [EM] The Principles of Parliamentary Representation Michael Allan
• [EM] the Burlington VT city council just voted to put a redistricting map i drew on the ballot for a charter change... robert bristow-johnson
• [EM] Another proportionality metric for multiwinner elections, and its optimal Yee diagram Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Improving the Sainte-Laguë index Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] A safe elimination method Forest Simmons
• Re: [EM] How to find the voters' honest preferences (Kevin Venzke) Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] How to find the voters' honest preferences (Kevin Venzke) Forest Simmons
• [EM] Modification of STV to guard against favourite betrayal Peter Zbornik
  • Re: [EM] Modification of STV to guard against favourite betrayal Jonathan Lundell
  • Re: [EM] Modification of STV to guard against favourite betrayal Peter Zbornik
  • Re: [EM] Modification of STV to guard against favourite betrayal Jonathan Lundell
  • Re: [EM] Modification of STV to guard against favourite betrayal robert bristow-johnson
  • Re: [EM] Modification of STV to guard against favourite betrayal Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] Modification of STV to guard against favourite betrayal Peter Zbornik
• [EM] How to find the voters' honest preferences Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] How to find the voters' honest preferences Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] How to find the voters' honest preferences Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] How to find the voters' honest preferences Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] How to find the voters' honest preferences Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] How to find the voters' honest preferences Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Automatic algorithm for coalition building Peter Gustafsson
  • Re: [EM] Automatic algorithm for coalition building Juho Laatu
• [EM] Possibly making Sainte-Lague even more STV-like Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Possibly making Sainte-Lague even more STV-like Vidar Wahlberg
  • Re: [EM] Possibly making Sainte-Lague even more STV-like Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Possibly making Sainte-Lague even more STV-like Vidar Wahlberg
  • Re: [EM] Possibly making Sainte-Lague even more STV-like Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Possibly making Sainte-Lague even more STV-like Vidar Wahlberg
  • Re: [EM] Possibly making Sainte-Lague even more STV-like Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Sociological issues of elections Vidar Wahlberg
  • Re: [EM] Sociological issues of elections Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] Sociological issues of elections Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Sociological issues of elections Vidar Wahlberg
  • Re: [EM] Sociological issues of elections Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] Sociological issues of elections Vidar Wahlberg
  • Re: [EM] Sociological issues of elections Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] Sociological issues of elections Michael Allan
  • Re: [EM] Sociological issues of elections Vidar Wahlberg
  • Re: [EM] Sociological issues of elections Michael Allan
  • Re: [EM] Sociological issues of elections Fred Gohlke
  • Re: [EM] Sociological issues of elections Fred Gohlke
  • Re: [EM] Sociological issues of elections Vidar Wahlberg
  • Re: [EM] Sociological issues of elections Fred Gohlke
  • Re: [EM] Sociological issues of elections Michael Allan
  • Re: [EM] Sociological issues of elections Fred Gohlke
  • Re: [EM] Sociological issues of elections Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Sociological issues of elections Vidar Wahlberg
  • Re: [EM] Sociological issues of elections Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Sociological issues of elections Fred Gohlke
  • Re: [EM] Sociological issues of elections Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Sociological issues of elections Fred Gohlke
  • Re: [EM] Sociological issues of elections Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Sociological issues of elections Fred Gohlke
  • Re: [EM] Sociological issues of elections Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Sociological issues of elections Fred Gohlke
  • Re: [EM] Sociological issues of elections Michael Allan
  • Re: [EM] Sociological issues of elections Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Update about Ending The Hidden Unfairness In U.S. Elections Richard Fobes
• [EM] Wikipedia article needs editing Richard Fobes
  • Re: [EM] Wikipedia article needs editing Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Wikipedia article needs editing Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Wikipedia article needs editing Richard Fobes
  • Re: [EM] Wikipedia article needs editing Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] 2 hours to get 3 pledges, or I send you $5 Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] [CES #9234] 2 hours to get 3 pledges, or I send you $5 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] [CES #9235] 2 hours to get 3 pledges, or I send you $5 Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] [CES #9235] 2 hours to get 3 pledges, or I send you $5 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Thought you guys might find this interesting Benjamin Grant
  • Re: [EM] Thought you guys might find this interesting Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Even more complex Sainte-Lague: method description and why Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Even more complex Sainte-Lague: strategy Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Even more complex Sainte-Lague: showing that compromising is fixed Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Gender imbalance in the voting reform community Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Want me to give you $5? (Or maybe, to donate to the CES)? Jameson Quinn
• [EM] An idiosyncratic 4-D chart of voting system quality Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] [CES #9172] An idiosyncratic 4-D chart of voting system quality Jameson Quinn
• [EM] "Top 2+1 Approval" primaries Jameson Quinn
  • [EM] "Top 2+1 Approval" primaries Michael Allan
  • Re: [EM] "Top 2+1 Approval" primaries Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] "Top 2+1 Approval" primaries Peter Gustafsson
  • Re: [EM] "Top 2+1 Approval" primaries Peter Gustafsson
  • Re: [EM] "Top 2+1 Approval" primaries Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Fwd: The list might like this... Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Fwd: The list might like this... Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Fwd: The list might like this... Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• Re: [EM] [CES #9085] Survey of high-view youtube voting system videos Benjamin Grant
• [EM] Here's an improved version David L Wetzell
• [EM] A simple simulation of a 3-seat LR Hare election. David L Wetzell
• [EM] A more Condorcet-like party list PR method Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] A more Condorcet-like party list PR method Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• Re: [EM] Burlington dumps IRV; Immunity from Majority Complaints (IMC) criterion Markus Schulze
• [EM] My Quora answer on egypt and voting systems Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] [CES #9066] My Quora answer on egypt and voting systems Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Post-mortem on wikimedia's recent approval-with-abstention election Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Post-mortem on wikimedia's recent approval-with-abstention election Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Quotaless STV-PR suggestion Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] Quotaless STV-PR suggestion Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • [EM] Quotaless STV-PR suggestion Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] Quotaless STV-PR suggestion Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] Quotaless STV-PR suggestion Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Discourse Benjamin Grant
  • Re: [EM] Discourse Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Discourse Benjamin Grant
  • Re: [EM] Discourse Juho Laatu
• Re: [EM] Outcome Design Goals David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] Outcome Design Goals Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Outcome Design Goals David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] Outcome Design Goals Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • [EM] FairVote comment on Burlington dumping IRV Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] FairVote comment on Burlington dumping IRV Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] FairVote comment on Burlington dumping IRV Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] FairVote comment on Burlington dumping IRV Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] FairVote comment on Burlington dumping IRV Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] FairVote comment on Burlington dumping IRV Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] FairVote comment on Burlington dumping IRV Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] FairVote comment on Burlington dumping IRV Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] FairVote comment on Burlington dumping IRV Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] FairVote comment on Burlington dumping IRV David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] FairVote comment on Burlington dumping IRV robert bristow-johnson
  • [EM] Burlington dumps IRV; Immunity from Majority Complaints (IMC) criterion seppley
  • Re: [EM] Burlington dumps IRV; Immunity from Majority Complaints (IMC) criterion Jameson Quinn
  • [EM] Immunity from Majority Complaints (IMC) & Condorcet's actual voting method (was Re: Burlington dumps IRV; Immunity from Majority Complaints (IMC) criterion) seppley
  • Re: [EM] Burlington dumps IRV; Immunity from Majority Complaints (IMC) criterion Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Burlington dumps IRV; Immunity from Majority Complaints (IMC) criterion Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Burlington dumps IRV; Immunity from Majority Complaints (IMC) criterion seppley
• [EM] EMAV? Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] EMAV? Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] [CES #9013] Re: EMAV? Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] [CES #9013] Re: EMAV? Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] [CES #9024] Re: EMAV? Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Before Voting Methods and Criteria: Outcome Design Goals (long) Benjamin Grant
  • Re: [EM] [CES #9004] Before Voting Methods and Criteria: Outcome Design Goals (long) Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] [CES #9004] Before Voting Methods and Criteria: Outcome Design Goals (long) Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Before Voting Methods and Criteria: Outcome Design Goals (long) Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] Before Voting Methods and Criteria: Outcome Design Goals (long) Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Before Voting Methods and Criteria: Outcome Design Goals (long) Jameson Quinn
• [EM] My diffs w. Kristofer are not anti-reason. David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] My diffs w. Kristofer are not anti-reason. Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] My diffs w. Kristofer are not anti-reason. Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] My diffs w. Kristofer are not anti-reason. David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] My diffs w. Kristofer are not anti-reason. Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] A candidate winning multiple seats. David L Wetzell
• [EM] calculating the N matrix in Schulze STV Alexander Kjäll
  • Re: [EM] calculating the N matrix in Schulze STV Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] calculating the N matrix in Schulze STV Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] calculating the N matrix in Schulze STV Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] calculating the N matrix in Schulze STV Markus Schulze
• [EM] Evaluative Majority Approval Voting Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] another concern - the opposite of the Spoiler Effect - *Packing* Benjamin Grant
  • Re: [EM] another concern - the opposite of the Spoiler Effect - *Packing* Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] another concern - the opposite of the Spoiler Effect - *Packing* Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] a re: Warren Smith's surveys. David L Wetzell
• [EM] Two notes and a possibly interesting method from a friend Benjamin Grant
  • Re: [EM] [CES #8982] Two notes and a possibly interesting method from a friend Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Two notes and a possibly interesting method from a friend Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] voter comprehension level of score, approval, and IRV (exit polls) Warren D Smith
  • Re: [EM] voter comprehension level of score, approval, and IRV (exit polls) Warren D Smith
  • Re: [EM] voter comprehension level of score, approval, and IRV (exit polls) Warren D. Smith (CRV cofounder, http://RangeVoting.org)
• [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats Vidar Wahlberg
  • Re: [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats Vidar Wahlberg
  • Re: [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats Vidar Wahlberg
  • Re: [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats Vidar Wahlberg
  • Re: [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats Vidar Wahlberg
  • Re: [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats Juho Laatu
  • [EM] EM list problems? Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] EM list problems? Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats Vidar Wahlberg
  • Re: [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats Juho Laatu

• Earlier messages