Messages by Date
-
2011/12/21
Re: [EM] Re et al Chicken and Egg
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
-
2011/12/21
Re: [EM] Re et al Chicken and Egg
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
-
2011/12/21
[EM] suggested improvement on Mutual Majority criterion/set
C.Benham
-
2011/12/20
[EM] Re et al Chicken and Egg
David L Wetzell
-
2011/12/19
[EM] Least Expected Umbrage, a new lottery method
fsimmons
-
2011/12/19
[EM] Answer to question about GMAT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2011/12/19
[EM] Least Expected Umbrage
Warren Smith
-
2011/12/19
Re: [EM] Who wronged the A-plumpers
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2011/12/19
Re: [EM] Least Expected Umbrage, a new lottery method
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
-
2011/12/19
[EM] An opportunity cost-based approach for getting scores from social rankings
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
-
2011/12/19
Re: [EM] Egg or Chicken.
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
-
2011/12/18
[EM] Least Expected Umbrage, a new lottery method
fsimmons
-
2011/12/18
[EM] Greatest-Mutual -Approval-Top (GMAT)
C.Benham
-
2011/12/17
Re: [EM] Electoral Experimentation
Richard Fobes
-
2011/12/17
[EM] Chris: What LNHe is. Your example.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2011/12/17
Re: [EM] Chicken or Egg re: Kathy Dopp
Dave Ketchum
-
2011/12/16
[EM] voters "specifically" wronged by Mono-add-Plump failure
C.Benham
-
2011/12/16
Re: [EM] Chicken or Egg re: Kathy Dopp
Ted Stern
-
2011/12/16
Re: [EM] Chicken or Egg re: Kathy Dopp
robert bristow-johnson
-
2011/12/16
Re: [EM] Election-Methods Digest, Vol 90, Issue 42
David L Wetzell
-
2011/12/16
[EM] Chicken or Egg re: Kathy Dopp
David L Wetzell
-
2011/12/16
Re: [EM] MMT: You're evading my questions. I didn't ask for repetition about generalities.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2011/12/16
[EM] how primary forecasts work
David L Wetzell
-
2011/12/16
[EM] You gave the right description of FairVote
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2011/12/16
[EM] Oops! Errors in GMAT definition. Correct definition.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2011/12/16
[EM] Greatest-Mutual -Approval-Top (GMAT)
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2011/12/16
Re: [EM] Egg or Chicken.
Kathy Dopp
-
2011/12/16
[EM] Chris: Regarding the criteriion "failures" you mentioned for MMT
C.Benham
-
2011/12/15
Re: [EM] Forest example
fsimmons
-
2011/12/15
[EM] FBC failure for acquiescing coalition methods
fsimmons
-
2011/12/15
Re: [EM] SODA strategy
Jameson Quinn
-
2011/12/15
[EM] Electoral Experimentation
David L Wetzell
-
2011/12/15
[EM] SODA strategy
fsimmons
-
2011/12/15
[EM] I didn't mean to post that message 3 times. I was notified that I'd have to re-send.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2011/12/15
Re: [EM] Electoral Experimentation
Richard Fobes
-
2011/12/15
[EM] Chris: Regarding the criteriion "failures" you mentioned for MMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2011/12/15
[EM] Chris: Regarding the criteriion "failures" you mentioned for MMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2011/12/15
[EM] Chris: Regarding the criteriion "failures" you mentioned for MMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2011/12/15
[EM] Electoral Experimentation
David L Wetzell
-
2011/12/15
[EM] Simple SODA strategy (post-election delegated phase)
Jameson Quinn
-
2011/12/15
Re: [EM] SODA might be the method we've been looking for.
Jameson Quinn
-
2011/12/15
Re: [EM] SODA might be the method we've been looking for.
Jameson Quinn
-
2011/12/15
Re: [EM] SODA might be the method we've been looking for.
Andrew Myers
-
2011/12/14
[EM] Electoral experimentation
Richard Fobes
-
2011/12/14
Re: [EM] Forest: MAMT
fsimmons
-
2011/12/14
[EM] Chris: The alternative to mutual majority
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2011/12/14
Re: [EM] SODA might be the method we've been looking for.
fsimmons
-
2011/12/14
[EM] Egg or Chicken.
David L Wetzell
-
2011/12/14
[EM] Forest: The example. Jameson: SODA
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2011/12/14
[EM] Forest: I found an FBC failure for Minimal Aquiescing Majorities-Top
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2011/12/14
Re: [EM] SODA might be the method we've been looking for.
Jameson Quinn
-
2011/12/14
Re: [EM] SODA might be the method we've been looking for.
Jameson Quinn
-
2011/12/14
Re: [EM] SODA might be the method we've been looking for.
Andy Jennings
-
2011/12/14
[EM] Forest: MAMT
C.Benham
-
2011/12/13
[EM] San Francisco considers getting rid of IRV
Kathy Dopp
-
2011/12/13
[EM] SODA might be the method we've been looking for.
Jameson Quinn
-
2011/12/13
Re: [EM] This might be the method we've been looking for:
Andy Jennings
-
2011/12/13
[EM] Forest: MAMT
C.Benham
-
2011/12/13
[EM] suggested improvement on Mutual Majority criterion/set
C.Benham
-
2011/12/12
[EM] The Occupy Movement: A Ray of Hope -- in Politics
Dave Ketchum
-
2011/12/12
Re: [EM] Mike: variations on Kevin's ABE and LRV
fsimmons
-
2011/12/12
Re: [EM] This might be the method we've been looking for:
fsimmons
-
2011/12/12
[EM] Forest: MAMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2011/12/12
[EM] Dave: Re: The Occupy-Movement
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2011/12/12
Re: [EM] This might be the method we've been looking for:
Andy Jennings
-
2011/12/12
[EM] Two failed postings, and then one complete one
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2011/12/12
[EM] Chris: MMT's strategy incentives
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2011/12/12
[EM] Chris: MMP's strategy incentives
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2011/12/12
[EM] Chris: MMP's strategy incentives
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2011/12/11
Re: [EM] [CES #4194] Re: The Occupy Movement: A Ray of Hope -- inPolitics
Leon Smith
-
2011/12/11
[EM] Mike Ossipoff: LRV properties
fsimmons
-
2011/12/11
[EM] The Occupy Movement: A Ray of Hope -- inPolitics
Dave Ketchum
-
2011/12/11
Re: [EM] [CES #4194] Re: The Occupy Movement: A Ray of Hope -- inPolitics
James Gilmour
-
2011/12/11
Re: [EM] [CES #4194] Re: The Occupy Movement: A Ray of Hope -- in Politics
Leon Smith
-
2011/12/11
Re: [EM] The Occupy Movement: A Ray of Hope -- in Politics
Dave Ketchum
-
2011/12/10
[EM] The Occupy Movement: A Ray of Hope -- in Politics
Michael Allan
-
2011/12/10
[EM] The Occupy Movement: A Ray of Hope -- in Politics
Dave Ketchum
-
2011/12/10
Re: [EM] finding the beat path winner with just one pass through the ranked pairs
Ross Hyman
-
2011/12/10
[EM] MAM evaluation. Summary of FBC/ABE methods.
fsimmons
-
2011/12/10
[EM] What are the entries for LRV in my FBC/ABE methods properties table?
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2011/12/10
[EM] (no subject)
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2011/12/10
[EM] MAM evaluation. Summary of FBC/ABE methods.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2011/12/10
[EM] Oops! Forgot to include Chris's text. Chris MMT reply, complete this time.
C.Benham
-
2011/12/10
Re: [EM] MMPO and Symmetric Completion
Jameson Quinn
-
2011/12/09
Re: [EM] finding the beat path winner with just one pass through the ranked pairs
Andrew Myers
-
2011/12/09
[EM] Least Resentment Voting (LRV) in the context of Approval
fsimmons
-
2011/12/09
Re: [EM] Acquiescing majority MMT (MIKE OSSIPOFF)
fsimmons
-
2011/12/09
Re: [EM] finding the beat path winner with just one pass through the ranked pairs
Rob LeGrand
-
2011/12/09
Re: [EM] finding the beat path winner with just one pass through the ranked pairs
Markus Schulze
-
2011/12/09
Re: [EM] MMPO and Symmetric Completion
fsimmons
-
2011/12/09
Re: [EM] This might be the method we've been looking for:
Jameson Quinn
-
2011/12/09
Re: [EM] This might be the method we've been looking for:
Andy Jennings
-
2011/12/09
[EM] Acquiescing majority MMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2011/12/09
[EM] Reply to a posting from Chris on November 17th, re: MDDTR
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2011/12/09
[EM] Oops! Forgot to include Chris's text. Chris MMT reply, complete this time.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2011/12/09
[EM] Chris: Criterion compliances of MMT2
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2011/12/09
[EM] MMT2 meets FBC, fails Mono-Add-Plump, as it should.
C.Benham
-
2011/12/09
Re: [EM] finding the beat path winner with just one pass through the ranked pairs
Ross Hyman
-
2011/12/09
[EM] finding the beat path winner with just one pass through the ranked pairs
Ross Hyman
-
2011/12/08
Re: [EM] Dave Ketchum: IRV strategy
Dave Ketchum
-
2011/12/08
Re: [EM] MMPO and Symmetric Completion
Jameson Quinn
-
2011/12/08
[EM] MMPO and Symmetric Completion
fsimmons
-
2011/12/08
Re: [EM] MMT
fsimmons
-
2011/12/08
[EM] Kristofer, regarding Proxy DD
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2011/12/08
[EM] MMT2 meets FBC, fails Mono-Add-Plump, as it should.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2011/12/08
Re: [EM] Kristofer: Proxy DD
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
-
2011/12/07
[EM] Chris: MMT criterion compliances.
C.Benham
-
2011/12/07
Re: [EM] Chris: MMT criterion compliances.
Jameson Quinn
-
2011/12/07
[EM] Dave Ketchum: IRV strategy
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2011/12/07
[EM] How to vote in IRV
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2011/12/07
[EM] Chris: MMT criterion compliances.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2011/12/07
[EM] That was MMT1. MMT2 is like MTAOC. Replacing the word "any" in the definitions.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2011/12/07
[EM] How to vote in IRV
C.Benham
-
2011/12/07
[EM] Complete MMT definition
C.Benham
-
2011/12/06
Re: [EM] How to vote in IRV
Dave Ketchum
-
2011/12/06
Re: [EM] Forest's FBC/ABC method
fsimmons
-
2011/12/06
[EM] Complete MMT definition
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2011/12/06
[EM] Oops! Chris is right. Yet another try at a definition.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2011/12/06
[EM] Chris: MMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2011/12/06
[EM] How to vote in IRV
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2011/12/06
[EM] Sorry--One more revision of MMT
C.Benham
-
2011/12/05
[EM] Chris: Forest's FBC/ABC method (MIKE OSSIPOFF)
fsimmons
-
2011/12/05
Re: [EM] Fwd: how goes American PR?
Ted Stern
-
2011/12/05
Re: [EM] Fwd: how goes American PR?
Ted Stern
-
2011/12/05
[EM] David, re: IRV. Chris, re: IRV
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2011/12/05
[EM] Chris: Forest's FBC/ABC method
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2011/12/05
[EM] Sorry--One more revision of MMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2011/12/03
Re: [EM] Fwd: how goes American PR?
robert bristow-johnson
-
2011/12/03
Re: [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.
Dave Ketchum
-
2011/12/03
Re: [EM] Fwd: how goes American PR?
Jameson Quinn
-
2011/12/03
Re: [EM] Fwd: how goes American PR?
Jameson Quinn
-
2011/12/03
Re: [EM] Fwd: how goes American PR?
David L Wetzell
-
2011/12/03
Re: [EM] Fwd: how goes American PR?
robert bristow-johnson
-
2011/12/03
Re: [EM] Fwd: how goes American PR?
Jan Kok
-
2011/12/03
Re: [EM] This might be the method we've been looking for:
fsimmons
-
2011/12/03
[EM] Fwd: how goes American PR?
David L Wetzell
-
2011/12/03
[EM] MMT written right
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2011/12/03
Re: [EM] IRV's adequacy depends on a two-party system
Juho Laatu
-
2011/12/03
[EM] This might be the method we've been looking for:
C.Benham
-
2011/12/03
Re: [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.
robert bristow-johnson
-
2011/12/02
Re: [EM] IRV's adequacy depends on a two-party system
Brian Olson
-
2011/12/02
Re: [EM] Analysis Finds Incorrect Use of Ranked-Choice Voting in San, Francisco
Ralph Suter
-
2011/12/02
[EM] Approval vs IRV
C.Benham
-
2011/12/02
Re: [EM] This might be the method we've been looking for:
fsimmons
-
2011/12/02
[EM] This might be the method we've been looking for:
fsimmons
-
2011/12/02
[EM] more anti-IRV propaganda...
David L Wetzell
-
2011/12/02
Re: [EM] EM] IRV's adequacy depends on a two-party system
Ted Stern
-
2011/12/02
Re: [EM] EM] IRV's adequacy depends on a two-party system
David L Wetzell
-
2011/12/02
[EM] Analysis Finds Incorrect Use of Ranked-Choice Voting in San Francisco
Ralph Suter
-
2011/12/02
Re: [EM] EM] IRV's adequacy depends on a two-party system
Jameson Quinn
-
2011/12/02
[EM] EM] IRV's adequacy depends on a two-party system
David L Wetzell
-
2011/12/02
[EM] IRV's adequacy depends on a two-party system
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2011/12/02
[EM] typo
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2011/12/02
[EM] MMT repaired. MTAOC simplified. Alternative definition of voting x over y.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2011/12/02
Re: [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.
David L Wetzell
-
2011/12/02
[EM] irv3/av3
David L Wetzell
-
2011/12/02
[EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.
David L Wetzell
-
2011/12/02
[EM] IRV3/AV3
Jameson Quinn
-
2011/12/02
Re: [EM] Re to Kristof M
David L Wetzell
-
2011/12/02
Re: [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
-
2011/12/02
Re: [EM] Re to Kristof M
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
-
2011/12/01
Re: [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.
Jameson Quinn
-
2011/12/01
Re: [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.
robert bristow-johnson
-
2011/12/01
Re: [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.
Dave Ketchum
-
2011/12/01
Re: [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.
robert bristow-johnson
-
2011/12/01
[EM] Approval vs. IRV
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2011/12/01
[EM] Kristofer: Proxy DD
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2011/11/30
Re: [EM] Kristofer, regarding Proxy DD
Jameson Quinn
-
2011/11/30
Re: [EM] Kristofer, regarding Proxy DD
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
-
2011/11/30
[EM] Ted: Voting system properties
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2011/11/30
Re: [EM] Condorcet system, or Condorcet efficiency? (was:... wrt Burlington et al.)
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
-
2011/11/30
[EM] Approval vs. IRV
C.Benham
-
2011/11/30
[EM] State's top-two runoff system under legal fire by political parties
Kathy Dopp
-
2011/11/30
Re: [EM] Condorcet system, or Condorcet efficiency? (was:... wrt Burlington et al.)
Jameson Quinn
-
2011/11/30
Re: [EM] Approval vs. IRV
Juho Laatu
-
2011/11/29
[EM] Approval vs. IRV
C.Benham
-
2011/11/29
Re: [EM] ... wrt Burlington et al.
robert bristow-johnson
-
2011/11/29
Re: [EM] Approval vs. IRV (hopefully tidier re-send)
Ted Stern
-
2011/11/29
Re: [EM] Simplest paper count to produce a winner in the smith set.
Jameson Quinn
-
2011/11/29
Re: [EM] Jameson: MMT, MTAOC, MJ
Jameson Quinn
-
2011/11/29
[EM] Small omission in MTAOC program
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2011/11/29
[EM] Approval vs IRV
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2011/11/29
Re: [EM] Simplest paper count to produce a winner in the smith set.
Clinton Mead
-
2011/11/29
[EM] Jameson: MMT, MTAOC, MJ
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2011/11/29
Re: [EM] Simplest paper count to produce a winner in the smith set.
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
-
2011/11/29
Re: [EM] new revised ranked pair method in matrix form
Ross Hyman
-
2011/11/29
Re: [EM] Approval vs. IRV
Juho Laatu
-
2011/11/28
Re: [EM] ranked pair method that resolves beath path ties.
Markus Schulze
-
2011/11/28
[EM] Simplest paper count to produce a winner in the smith set.
Clinton Mead
-
2011/11/28
Re: [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage.
Dave Ketchum
-
2011/11/28
[EM] Approval vs. IRV (hopefully tidier re-send)
Chris Benham
-
2011/11/28
[EM] Approval vs. IRV
C.Benham
-
2011/11/28
[EM] new revised ranked pair method in matrix form
Ross Hyman
-
2011/11/28
Re: [EM] ranked pair method that resolves beath path ties.
Ross Hyman
-
2011/11/28
[EM] Forrest--ABC & FBC passing methods
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2011/11/28
[EM] Kristofer, regarding Proxy DD
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2011/11/28
[EM] Comments on MMT & MTAOC. Much improved revised MTAOC.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2011/11/28
Re: [EM] ranked pair method that resolves beath path ties.
Markus Schulze
-
2011/11/28
Re: [EM] MMCWPO (minimize maximum cardinal weighted pairwise opposition) satisfies the FBC and solves the ABE problem.
Ted Stern
-
2011/11/28
Re: [EM] ranked pair method that resolves beath path ties.
Ross Hyman