Chris Radek wrote: > On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 06:06:58PM +0200, yann jautard wrote: > >> Did you use G64 P<tolerance> when using G41/42 to cut a corner ? This >> could explain why it did not produced an error. >> > > This is unrelated. > > > ok, sorry, I must learn to shut my damn mouth when I do not know things :/
As I read the rest of explanation, I understand very well why this is unrelated. But as Stuart suggests : It seems to me that just having a configuration option somewhere, or a > register, or a parameter, or a menu choice somewhere - such as whether > > to treat the condition as an error, warning, or silent, and knowing the > > result - would help to solve the "desired" unknown. For myself, in most > > situations it would be very convenient to just follow the path and leave > > what it cannot reach, Why cant be something that is used like the G64 ? I mean defining a tolerance on the part corners, not oriented to keep the cutting speed but to keep the path runing in those cases where a point is unreachable due to the tool diameter. Well I see a case where this can't work without needing a bit more intelligence : http://imagebin.ca/view/htk7AZmT.html Here this should work for the green zone, but the red one will never be reached without a bit of complicated thinking. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Make an app they can't live without Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
