;-)
How about the following (about which I’m serious)?
function defineRec(f) {
return args => f(f, ...args);
}
let factorial = defineRec((me, n) => n <= 1 ? 1 : n * me(me, n-1))
On Mar 17, 2013, at 14:33 , "Mark S. Miller" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Just in case anyone does not realize that this thread is humorous,
>
> const factorial = n => n>1 ? n*factorial(n-1) : 1;
>
> Yes, you can't use this as an expression. So what? After this declaration you
> can use factorial as an expression. Anonymous lambda expressions are a
> wonderful things. But in actual development, I have never yet encountered a
> recursive function I didn't want to name.
>
> Ok, and now back to our irregularly scheduled humor...
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 6:19 AM, Kevin Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Sorry arrow functions but this isn't a better JS.
>
> Bah. Arrow functions are a huge usability win for JS. Try them- you'll see!
>
> { Kevin }
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> --MarkM
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
--
Dr. Axel Rauschmayer
[email protected]
home: rauschma.de
twitter: twitter.com/rauschma
blog: 2ality.com
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
