This is probably the most humor I've ever seen on esdiscuss. On Mar 17, 2013, at 6:33 AM, "Mark S. Miller" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Just in case anyone does not realize that this thread is humorous, > > const factorial = n => n>1 ? n*factorial(n-1) : 1; > > Yes, you can't use this as an expression. So what? After this declaration you > can use factorial as an expression. Anonymous lambda expressions are a > wonderful things. But in actual development, I have never yet encountered a > recursive function I didn't want to name. > > Ok, and now back to our irregularly scheduled humor... > > > > > On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 6:19 AM, Kevin Smith <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> Sorry arrow functions but this isn't a better JS. >> >> Bah. Arrow functions are a huge usability win for JS. Try them- you'll see! >> >> { Kevin } >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> es-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > > > > -- > Cheers, > --MarkM > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
