Allen Brown
Sat, 22 Jan 2005 09:39:28 -0800
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005, Bob Miller wrote: > Jacob Meuser wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 01:01:14PM -0800, Max Lemieux wrote: > > > Agreed, vi seems to be the universally present editor. > > > > ed is the universal editor. > > No, ed is the STANDARD text editor. > http://www.gnu.org/fun/jokes/ed.msg.html > > I agree with Max. Nano is a good, non-confusing editor. I'll bet I've > been using emacs longer than anyone here -- I first used the original > TECo-based version on MIT-AI sometime in 1978. But I'm still aware > that emacs is a bear to learn. > -- > Bob Miller K<bob>
I used a micro emacs (forgot it's name) under CP/M about the same time. 1978+-1. Nano is the editor that pine uses? I can't stand it. -- Allen _______________________________________________ EUGLUG mailing list euglug@euglug.org http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug