P.S., you should be able to use $see-also the way you want to use $related.
> On Dec 14, 2016, at 1:02 PM, John Benediktsson <mrj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> It's not broken, it's kinda an implementation detail of related-words. If you
> look at the code for $related it checks for a "related" word-prop. To
> generate a see-also list.
>
>> On Dec 14, 2016, at 3:14 AM, Alexander Ilin <ajs...@yandex.ru> wrote:
>>
>> `related-words` does work, no question.
>> I'm talking specifically about `$related`, which seems to be broken.
>>
>> 14.12.2016, 00:38, "John Benediktsson" <mrj...@gmail.com>:
>>> Look at `related-words`.
>>>
>>>> On Dec 14, 2016, at 12:51 AM, Alexander Ilin <ajs...@yandex.ru> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello!
>>>>
>>>> `$related` doesn't seem to work for me. Can anyone verify?
>>>>
>>>> I'm doing this:
>>>>
>>>> HELP: (go)
>>>> { $description "Implementation of the " { $link go } " word without
>>>> checking the current speed." }
>>>> { $related go } ;
>>>>
>>>> I expect to see the "See also" section in the `(go)` article with the
>>>> `go` entry in it, but that doesn't happen.
>>>>
>>>> Searching through the codebase I can see not a single use of the
>>>> `$related`. Is it broken?
>>
>> ---=====---
>> Александр
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>> engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>> _______________________________________________
>> Factor-talk mailing list
>> Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Factor-talk mailing list
Factor-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
