On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Prarit Bhargava <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Part of the problem with that idea is that the Pentium M laptops without >> PAE >> aren't that old. This might upset quite a few people. >> >> > > Right -- and that's a good point to keep in mind. IMO we shouldn't break > *any* systems when we do this change. > > Given the other information coming through (about dynamic kernel PAE > enable), should we really being doing this right now? > > Why not wait for the dynamic PAE stuff to settle upstream and then make the > change? Then we can properly (IMO) drop kernel-PAE.686 and stick with > kernel.686.
dynamic PAE ? _______________________________________________ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
