laurieskatz
Wed, 02 Apr 2008 19:22:01 -0700
L----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <felvtalk@felineleukemia.org> Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 6:28 PM Subject: RE: Another Important Question
Here's the thing.... FELV actually is not fatal in it of itself. Rather, itcan cause suppression of the immune system and a cat can then die from complications of other diseases. Example--I believe that kittens who are positive are at higher risk of succumbing to Upper RespiratoryInfections--infections from which they might well recover were their immunesystem not compromised. Older cats seem to be more at risk of getting certain lymphomas, have problems with anemia, etc. But again, nothing is certain... I have 2 FELV+ cats one of whom, Tucson, lived with my 3 negatives for 5 years before I knew she was even positive. They all groomed each other, occasionally swatted each other, used the same litter boxes, shared food/water dishes, toys, etc. For me, I knew I couldn't separate them and vaccinated the non-positives and just went on as usual==that was almost 4 years ago and everybody's still fine. I do give them some higher quality food, Wellness, but that's more because a couple are real porkos and I was trying to get away from too much dry food and too many fillers. My second FElV+, Romeo, is a stray that I'd been feeding outside for a couple of years--I never dreamed he was positive as I had never seen him sick. He's probably the oldest of my brood and he's had some gum problems which wehandled with antibiotics--not very costly. When I first found out my Tucsonwas positive, I ran to the vet every two seconds--but after a while, Icalmed down. Many people on this board take in positive kittens and sadly, those I think, are at highest risk. I had my Tucson since she was a kittenbut clearly, she got through the most critical period and is now her hefty 18 lbs and a cantankerous calico to boot! I've not done interferon and outside of some relatively inexpensive supplements that I periodically try to get into their food, I haven't done much different than if they were all negative. I know the personality ofthese two, and I know that if things do go bad, it would be more hurtful tosubject them to too much--they're just those kinds of cats.Outside cats, clearly, have more problems cause they're much more likely to get worn down, to not be as well fed, to be in the cold, etc. Inside, withsome decent food, they've got a good chance of just living regular lives.Of course, anything can happen but the way I look at it, anything can happenwith my negative cats too. Christiane Biagi 914-632-4672 Cell: 913-720-6888 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 7:27 PM To: felvtalk@felineleukemia.org Subject: Another Important Question One of the ladies in Iowa to whom I spoke mentioned the possibility that Binxy may only be a carrier of the disease since she is four yrs. old and healthy. So, is there any way (other than the passage of time) to definitively determine whether she is just a carrier? And, am I correct in the assumption that being a carrier only would give her the same life expectancy as any other cat who does not carry this virus? Or can a cat convert from being just a carrier to being actively infected for whatever reason?---just trying to get my facts straight. Thanks. Caroline -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.fastmail.fm - Email service worth paying for. Try it for free