Max Horn wrote: > Of course Bruce is a bit biased
It *is* my toy, after all. :-) So, guilty as charged. > so let me just name you a thing that > might speak against autogen (or esp. autoopt): it requires guile. AutoGen, si; AutoOpts, no. You have to have Guile to generate the options code and then either ship libopts with your code or depend upon it being installed. But, libopts does not use libguile. > That might not be a problem in your case at all of course. I only > know that in at least one app I can't use it for this reason :-) Oh. Sorry. Someday, when someone asks, I'll make a more easily packageable libopts. Would that have solved your problem? Bruce Korb <first initial + last name at gnu dot org> AG URL: http://autogen.sourceforge.net ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Two, two, TWO treats in one. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
