18.04.2017 21:21, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote: > On 18/04/2017 15:01, Vlad Khorsun wrote: >> 18.04.2017 20:21, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote: >>> On 18/04/2017 13:43, Vlad Khorsun wrote: >>>> Some time ago there was discussion about sharing snapshots. As for >>>> me, it >>>> is useful feature. Not a "must have", but useful. >>>> >>>> With current implementation of database snapshots (private copy of >>>> TIP) >>>> it is not enough just to specify "base" transaction number to obtain its >>>> snapshot, especially for Classic. >>> Can you please explain more? >> I mean, that "secondary" transaction should obtain somehow the private >> copy >> of (part of) TIP created by the "base" transaction when it started. >> >> Read the thread "How to? Coordinating transactions for multiple >> connections in >> single call" started by the Sean at 02 April 2014. It contains all details. > > LOL. I used same term "base transaction number" as now (even thinking > it's bad) in that thread, and you, Jim and me appeared to have agreed on > a solution (for the first or single time LOL).
It happens :) Regards, Vlad ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
