I think because of a lack of overview. When you go there initially, you're immediately reading the latest article, which, if you understand the context and what the site is, is fine... but if you don't, then it can be confusing.
Julian http://www.getcontented.com.au/ - You Need GetContented - The Best Thing Since Sliced Websites! :) On 28 Sep 2014, at 12:58 pm, Trevor Wennblom <tre...@umn.edu> wrote: > How so Julian? Hehe. > > On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 8:20 PM, Julian Leviston <jul...@leviston.net> wrote: > Hehe that's interesting. I'd never associated LTU with modern languages. I'm > not sure why. Possibly because of the archaic UX and UI. It's incredibly > difficult to parse. > > J > > http://www.getcontented.com.au/ - You Need GetContented - Get Your Website > Happy. :) > > On 28 Sep 2014, at 12:37 am, Miles Fidelman <mfidel...@meetinghouse.net> > wrote: > >> David Barbour wrote: >>> A proposed stack exchange for programming language theory has reached >>> commitment phase. It needs two hundred people. If you're interested in PL, >>> please participate: >>> >> >> For those not aware of it, the starting point for discussions of programming >> language theory is http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/ >> >> Miles Fidelman >> >> -- >> In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. >> In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra >> >> _______________________________________________ >> fonc mailing list >> fonc@vpri.org >> http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc >> > > > _______________________________________________ > fonc mailing list > fonc@vpri.org > http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc > > > _______________________________________________ > fonc mailing list > fonc@vpri.org > http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
_______________________________________________ fonc mailing list fonc@vpri.org http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
