adelmelle
Wed, 07 May 2008 10:41:32 -0700
Author: adelmelle Date: Wed May 7 10:41:07 2008 New Revision: 654190 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=654190&view=rev Log: Added comment Modified: xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/flow/Wrapper.java Modified: xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/flow/Wrapper.java URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/flow/Wrapper.java?rev=654190&r1=654189&r2=654190&view=diff ============================================================================== --- xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/flow/Wrapper.java (original) +++ xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/flow/Wrapper.java Wed May 7 10:41:07 2008 @@ -67,8 +67,13 @@ "(#PCDATA|%inline;|%block;)"); } } else if (isBlockOrInlineItem(nsURI, localName)) { + /* delegate validation to parent, but keep the error reporting + * tidy. If we would simply call validateChildNode() on the + * parent, the user would get a wrong impression, as only the + * locator (if any) will contain a reference to the offending + * fo:wrapper. + */ try { - //delegate validation to parent FONode.validateChildNode(this.parent, loc, nsURI, localName); } catch (ValidationException vex) { invalidChildError(loc, getName(), FO_URI, localName, "rule.wrapperInvalidChildForParent"); --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]