Andreas Delmelle
Tue, 01 Jul 2008 11:57:51 -0700
On Jun 19, 2008, at 20:05, Andreas Delmelle wrote:
On Jun 19, 2008, at 18:34, Jean-François El Fouly wrote:
Jean-François (and other interested parties), Just as a heads-up:
<snip />Before going any further, will 1.1 features be considered by the dev teamfor inclusion in FOP trunk if ever we succeed in implementing them ?Definitely! In current FOP trunk, fo:retrieve-table-marker has been prepared to some extent (the FO-tree side is roughly OK)For the remainder, I can think of a few other features I was recently thinking of myself: - fo:folio-prefix / fo:folio-suffix (this I think to be the most straightforward to implement)
During the weekend, I already committed a change to Constants.java as a very small first step.
In the meantime, I'm close to getting fo:folio-prefix and fo:folio- suffix to work.
The rest remains open for now. Just thought I'd let this know, so we don't work on the same things.
Cheers Andreas