On Mon, 11 Nov 2013 20:35:06 +0100, Jan Nijtmans <[email protected]>
wrote:
2013/11/11 j. van den hoff <[email protected]>:
well, if you ask me, I then would prefer the latter solution since
it minimizes the number of cases where the line actually is visible.
Agreed. Done in:
<http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/8e01c2257d>
that would have been nice but your change has been "silently" (or so it
seems) undone in rev.
ab4d4dacf7. could someone please explain
why the ` === line/entry limit reached ===' lines are that important? I
personally just find them distracting.
and the solution in 8e01c2257d still would have sufficed to differentiate
the relevant cases -- at least that
was my understanding of your explanations.
Thanks for your suggestion!
Regards,
Jan Nijtmans
--
Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
