I'm thinking I might want the ability to describe branches and tags
separate from the check-in comments.

Maybe a wiki page with the same name as the branch or tag would serve
the purpose, then in the wiki page there could be links to tickets or
whatever else is needed to describe what is going on.

But that's not quite enough.  Or rather, it's sometimes too much.  I'd
like to summarize the purpose of the branch or tag.  The name kind of
does that, but it has to be very terse for ease of typing.

In my case I'd like to copy the associated ClearQuest activity title.
Right now I'm using it as the check-in comment for when the branch
ultimately gets integrated to trunk.  That works, but in order to get
the title I have to click on the tag in the tag list.  Would be good to
see them all in one page (or a filtered subset thereof) so I can search
for keywords.

Well actually there's already a fulltext search, but I don't think
there's a way to limit it to only check-ins to trunk or to do other
filters, e.g. only for check-ins having tags matching a glob pattern.

Plus the check-in comment trick doesn't work to describe branches that
haven't been integrated to trunk yet.  The check-in comments on branches
just describe the actual changes being performed, and I don't feel good
about also shoehorning the activity titles in there.  Maybe each branch
could start with an empty check-in just to hold the title.  Doesn't the
"branch new" command do that?  Oh wait, it doesn't allow the check-in
comment to be specified, and following each one up with an amend seems
wasteful.

Automatically linking branch and tag names to like-named wiki pages
doesn't seem like too major a change.  But creating a space to provide a
short description (akin to a check-in comment) of branches and tags
could require a new type of control artifact.  Or it could require that
the wiki page be specially formatted, e.g. the first paragraph is taken
to be the description, which is probably a better idea anyway so it can
all be edited in the same interface.

Any thoughts?

-- 
Andy Goth | <andrew.m.goth/at/gmail/dot/com>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to