On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 6:04 PM, Warren Young <w...@etr-usa.com> wrote:
> On Jun 17, 2016, at 1:59 PM, Scott Robison <sc...@casaderobison.com> > wrote: > > > > Would it be a bad thing to just settle on LF only going forward, always > stripping CR? > > The argument over canonicalizing all text input to LF has been had here > before — with me as at least one of its proponents — but I did not get the > sense that the proposal was getting much traction. > > But what the hey, I’ll make another stab: > > For any blob data that Fossil considers “text,” why not strip all CRs on > ingest, then based on either a setting or platform check inject CRs as > necessary when expelling a copy from the DB? Then users checking out on > Windows will see the CRLFs they want, and Fossil doesn’t have to deal with > CRs appearing and disappearing as different users on different platforms > edit the same files? > Ah. I was just thinking for the text that fossil itself injects, not something that would impact all blobs. I wouldn't be opposed to that myself, but I can appreciate why it isn't a desirable thing for fossil to do. -- Scott Robison
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
