On 06/23/2016 05:57 PM, Fossil SCM user's discussion wrote:


    I agree. This sucks. Also writing because I want some juice spam
    to inspect.
    Finally not understanding why the list of subscribers cannot be better
    controlled, given the underlying issue is a spammer is subscribed
    to the ML.


The spammers bot is subscribing new accounts as needed to continue to do spam activity.

Which prevents the simple approach we used on sqlite-users to flush out the spammer. (this reply is mainly so I can see the exciting spam messages everyone else is talking about...).

Dan.





UNTIL the first postings of each correspondent is held pending moderator action (and for the sanity of the moderator - spam determination) the bot is always going to be able to outpace people attempts to thwart spam.

Or you could stick with this "from:fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org <mailto:from%3afossil-us...@lists.fossil-scm.org>, to: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org <mailto:fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org>" situation, and lose loads of goodwill.

- Paul H




_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to