This change, if not reverted to something more pleasant, is going to kill this mailing list. I agree with Andy (at least, I think it was he) who said that not all opinions are equally weighted; I like to know who's speaking before I invest time in reading their post. Spam is a perennial problem facing the whole internet (and even RL with fliers in your mailbox and under your windscreen wipers, yadda). It's not Fossil's job to Kill All Spam. We all have and use spam filters. It's just a part of life. It's one of the unspoken rules of engagement when signing up to participate online: you will be spammed; you will be trolled; welcome aboard.
Barry (an almost nobody on this list, weight=$0.02) On 25 June 2016 at 07:08, Fossil SCM user's discussion < fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org> wrote: > No, anonymity doesn't sucks... > I want anonymity because as I said, people don't want or even can't show > up there details. > And IMHO, privacy is something that we would like to have for our safety > and everyone else safety... > > Those who would like to be known, I suggest them to put the appropriate > inof they may want in the signature. > No one, not me at least, would be bothered about that... > > Only bad conduct should be banned, and I suppose that Fossil have got all > the information to stop people. > (IP adress, e-mail, etc.) > > PS: Hmmm... So no one is interested about my suggest ? > (Why don't we go vote for the behavior we do want for this mailing list) > Have a nice WE, everyone. > > > Best Regards > > K. > > > ------------------------------ > *De :* Fossil SCM user's discussion <fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org> > *À :* fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > *Envoyé le :* Vendredi 24 juin 2016 17h43 > *Objet :* Re: [fossil-users] More reply spam... > > On 6/23/2016 9:11 PM, Fossil SCM user's discussion wrote: > > Thus said Fossil SCM user's discussion on Thu, 23 Jun 2016 09:24:26 > +0200: > >> the tree-like nature of a thread is now gone (isn't it?) > > No, threading should still work. Just start a new thread with a > > different subject. Typically threading is handled by Reference or > > In-Reply-To header analysis. > > We now have an example of a fresh thread. Anonymity still sucks, but at > least threading does work. > > -- > Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com > Cheshire Engineering Corp. http://www.CheshireEng.com/ > <http://www.cheshireeng.com/> > +1 626 303 1602 > > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users > >
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
