On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 1:21 AM, Kain Abel <isoru...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Git has no open and close, but also stash. git combines clone/open into a single operation, and each clone is tied to a single open copy, whereas fossil separates them: one clone can serve multiple local checkouts. The stash information belongs in the checkout, not in the clone (otherwise you would see it from all opened checkouts from that clone, which would likely just cause confusion). > A former ;) git user would > lose the stash without asking if he uses close (out of whichever > reasons) w/o RTfineM. The loss of stashed changes (== working time) > could be a disappointment (as an user experience). > The key aspect is the loss of information and not the omission of > reading the manual. > i'm guessing that few people ever use 'close'? (i have never - in over 8 years - used it except when testing fossil.) -- ----- stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ "Freedom is sloppy. But since tyranny's the only guaranteed byproduct of those who insist on a perfect world, freedom will have to do." -- Bigby Wolf
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
